G-显带技术、荧光原位杂交和比较基因组杂交技术在产前诊断中的应用

目的 探讨G显带、荧光原位杂交(fluorescencein situ hybridization,FISH)和比较基因组杂交(comparative genomic hybridization,CGH)技术在产前诊断中应用的程序及意义.方法 采集102例妊娠16周～24周胎儿的羊水,采用G显带、G显带/FISH和G显带/FISH/CGH三阶梯的核型诊断程序,并分析其在产前诊断中的意义.结果 102例胎儿中,经第1阶梯诊断核型98例,诊断困难2例,失败2例;第2阶梯诊断核型2例,诊断困难1例,失败1例;第3阶梯诊断核型2例.经3阶梯诊断程序核型的诊断率达100%(102/102例),异常核型7例(7/102例,6.68 0A),其中第1、第2和第3阶梯分别诊断异常核型4例(4/7例,57.1 oA)、1例(1/7例,14.3%)和2例(2/7例,28.5%).结论 在产前诊断中实施3阶梯诊断程序有助于提高核型的确诊率,规范染色体诊断流程.

The application and significance in prenatal diagnosis using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization

Objective To investigate the procedure and the value of G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomie hybridization (CGH) techniques in prenatal diagnosis. Methods Karyotype analyses with three diagnostic procedures, G-banding, G-banding and FISH, G-banding, FISH and CGH, were performed in the amniotic fluid samples taken from 102 fetuses at gestational ages 16-24 weeks. And the significance was valued in prenatal diagnosis. Results In the first procedure of karyotype analysis, 98 cases were diagnosed, 2 cases were not conformed while 2 cases were failed in all 102 cases. In the second procedure, 2 cases were determined, 1 case was not conformed and 1 case was still failed. In the third step, 2 cases were diagnosed. The diagnostic rate of the karyotype reached to 100% (102/102 cases) using all the three procedures. In total; seven cases with chromosomal abnormality were diagnosed. Four cases, 1 case and 2 cases were identified in the first step (4/7, 57.1 %),the second (1/7, 14.3%) and the third (2/7, 28.5%), respectively. Conclusion It can help improve the diagnostic rate of chromosomal aberrations and standardize diagnostic procedure to perform the three detecting steps in prenatal diagnosis.