| Abstract: | PurposeTo evaluate differences in arteriographic findings and outcomes after embolization among patients with a suspected iatrogenic renal arterial injury (IRAI).Materials and MethodsPatients at the authors’ institution who underwent renal arteriography for suspected IRAIs after partial nephrectomy, biopsy, or percutaneous access over a 20-year period were included. Records, imaging, and outcomes were reviewed. Data analysis was performed using the Fisher exact or Kruskal-Wallis test.ResultsNinety arteriograms were performed on 83 patients after partial nephrectomy (n = 32), biopsy (n = 27), or percutaneous access (n = 24), including for nephrostomy/ureterostomy and stone removal. The median number of days between the index procedure and arteriogram was highest (15 days) after partial nephrectomy and lowest (5 days) after biopsy (P = .0001). Embolization was performed during 76% of arteriograms. If prearteriographic imaging showed positive results for IRAIs, embolization was performed in 67% versus 33% if imaging showed negative results (P = .005). The transfusion rate was higher after biopsy than after partial nephrectomy or percutaneous access (P = .002). Acute kidney injury after arteriogram occurred in 7% of patients; however, all returned to baseline by 1 week.ConclusionsDespite the different mechanism of IRAIs in partial nephrectomy, biopsy, and percutaneous access, arteriographic findings and outcomes were overall similar among groups. Prearteriographic imaging can help identify IRAIs but cannot supersede the clinical judgment regarding indication for embolization. IRAIs can present acutely or after a long interim, although patients who underwent biopsy presented earlier and more frequently required a blood transfusion. IRAIs can be treated with embolization without permanent deleterious effects on renal function. |
