Individual,Psychosocial, and Social Correlates of Unprotected Anal Intercourse in a New Generation of Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in New York City

Objectives. We examined associations of individual, psychosocial, and social factors with unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) among young men who have sex with men in New York City.Methods. Using baseline assessment data from 592 young men who have sex with men participating in an ongoing prospective cohort study, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the associations between covariates and likelihood of recently engaging in UAI with same-sex partners.Results. Nineteen percent reported recent UAI with a same-sex partner. In multivariable models, being in a current relationship with another man (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.87), an arrest history (AOR = 2.01), greater residential instability (AOR = 1.75), and unstable housing or homelessness (AOR = 3.10) was associated with recent UAI. Although high levels of gay community affinity and low internalized homophobia were associated with engaging in UAI in bivariate analyses, these associations did not persist in multivariable analyses.Conclusions. Associations of psychosocial and socially produced conditions with UAI among a new generation of young men who have sex with men warrant that HIV prevention programs and policies address structural factors that predispose sexual risk behaviors.Young men who have sex with men (MSM) continue to be at increased risk for the acquisition and transmission of HIV. Nationally, among those aged 13 to 24 years, the estimate of new HIV infections attributed to male-to-male sexual contact increased from 61% in 2006 to 71% in 2009.1 In New York City between 2001 and 2008, 73% of HIV diagnoses among male adolescents and young adults were among young MSM.2 These national and local surveillance data confirm that a third generation of MSM, a generation that did not witness the heightened morbidity and mortality of the early AIDS epidemic, continue to bear a disproportionate burden of HIV/AIDS. In addition to these epidemiological trends, adolescents and young adults are at heightened risk for HIV/AIDS because the periods of adolescence and young adulthood are marked by a higher prevalence of HIV-related risk behaviors such as unprotected sex and illicit drug use.3,4 Moreover, these periods are often characterized by significant transitions and challenges for young MSM, specifically around the formation of sexual identity as well as coming out to family members and peers that may all coalesce to increase vulnerability for HIV.To date, research related to HIV risk among MSM, and more specifically young MSM, has generally focused on understanding the influence of individual-level characteristics on risk-taking behaviors. For example, it is well established that factors such as educational attainment,5 race/ethnicity,6–8 sexual orientation,9 age at sexual onset,8,10 and relationship status11,12 are associated with sexual risk-taking behaviors, such as engaging in unprotected anal intercourse (UAI). In addition, previous research indicates that those with a history of arrest and incarceration are more likely to engage in greater sexual risk behaviors than are those without such a history.13,14More recently, research efforts have moved beyond examining individual-level characteristics by considering both protective and harmful psychosocial states that may either buffer against or exacerbate vulnerabilities that function as drivers of HIV-related sexual risk behaviors.15,16 For instance, experiences of homophobia can often lead to discomfort with one’s sexual identity and may act as a significant psychosocial stressor linked to increased sexual risk taking.17,18 Conversely, young MSM with positive attitudes about homosexuality are less likely to have multiple sex partners and may be less likely to engage in UAI.19 Finally, gay community affiliation may function to either protect against or exacerbate the risk for HIV transmission and acquisition.Exposure and access to gay neighborhoods with norms promoting safer sexual behaviors may lead to safer sexual practices, such as consistent condom use, among MSM20 as well as greater awareness about HIV education and services available to MSM.21 However, higher gay community affinity among a younger generation of MSM may be associated with greater sexual risk taking in the absence of norms promoting safer sexual behaviors.22Increasingly, empirical research has examined the impact of social factors for their association with sexual risk taking among MSM overall.23 For example, several studies have linked poverty and economic disadvantage as socially produced risk factors associated with sexual risk taking among MSM.24,25 These associations may be more pronounced among individuals with higher levels of residential or housing instability or homelessness because they may engage in sex work to secure vital material resources and therefore be at an increased risk for HIV transmission and acquistion.24,26–28 Because of the need to understand the effect of individual, psychosocial, and social factors on HIV risk among young MSM, we sought to characterize how these factors influence sexual risk behaviors, specifically UAI, in a sample of young MSM. These findings have the potential to inform novel HIV/AIDS-related prevention and intervention efforts for this new generation of men.