| 三种不同静脉行PICC置管的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邢冬婕,邢凤梅.三种不同静脉行PICC置管的比较[J].中国误诊学杂志,2012,12(14):3496-3497. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邢冬婕 邢凤梅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 河北省唐山市妇幼保健院普外科 063000
2. 河北联合大学护理与康复学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2011年唐山市科学技术研究与发展指导计划项目（111302040a） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 观察三种不同静脉行PICC置管的差别.方法 将120例住院患者随机分为A贵要静脉组(n=40例)、B肘正中静脉组(n=40例)、C头静脉组(n=40例),分别观察三组患者穿刺置管1次成功率及留置时间情况.结果 三组静脉穿刺置管1次成功率的差异有统计学意义(x2=6.35,P＜0.05)；留置时间比较差异有统计学意义(x2=7.56,P＜0.05).结论 经贵要静脉和肘正中静脉穿刺置管成功率及留置时间均显著高于经头静脉穿刺置管.
|
| 关 键 词： | 导管 留置 导管插入术 中心静脉/方法 |
Comparison of three different kinds of intravenous lines in PICC |
| |
| XING Dong-jie
,
XING Feng-mei.Comparison of three different kinds of intravenous lines in PICC[J].Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics,2012,12(14):3496-3497. |
| |
| Authors: | XING Dong-jie XING Feng-mei |
| |
| Institution: | Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Tangshan , Tangshan 063000 ,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To observe the difference of three different intravenous lines in PICC. Methods 120 patients were randomly divided into A basilic vein group（ n= 40）, B median cubital vein group（ n= 40 ）, C cephalic vein group （n= 40） ,the three groups were observed in patients with catheterization（1 time） and the success rate of indwelling time. Results The three groups of venipuncture successful rate of the difference was significant（x2=6. 35, P〈 0.05） ;indwelling time difference was significant（x2 =7.56,P〈0.05 ）. Conclusion The basilic vein or median cubital vein puncture success rate and retention time are significantly higher than that of the cephalic vein puncture. |
| |
| Keywords: | Catheters Indwelling Catheterization Central Venous/methods |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
