电针与百优解对伴躯体症状抑郁症有效性的评价

目的：评价电针与百优解治疗轻、中度伴躯体症状抑郁症的临床疗效及安全性。方法：将75例患者随机分为西药组（A组）、电针组（B组）、针药组（C组）各25例。A组口服百优解，每天20mg；B组采用电针疗法，取穴以百会、印堂为主；C组口服百优解加电针。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）评定临床疗效，TESS副反应量表评定药物不良反应。结果：临床总有效率A组为78．3％，B组为82．6％，C组为91．7％，C组与A组、B组之间的差异有显著性意义（P〈0．05），B组和C组在改善躯体症状方面疗效显著，使用百优解的C组不良反应较A组少。结论：电针能明显改善抑郁症患者的躯体症状，减轻百优解的不良反应，针药结合治疗轻、中度伴躯体症状抑郁症疗效好，不良反应少，值得临床推广。

Assessment of effectiveness of electroacupuncture and Fluoxetine for treatment of depression with physical symptoms

OBJECTIVE: To study on clinical therapeutic effect and safety of electroacupuncture and Fluoxetine for treatment of mild or moderate depression with physical symptoms. METHODS: Seventy-five cases were randomly divided into a western medicine group (group A), an electroacupunctue group(group B) and an electroacupuncture plus medicine group (group C), 25 cases in each group. The group A were treated by oral Fluoxetine, 20 mg each day; the group B by electroacupuncture with Baihui (GV 20) and Yintang (EX-HN 3) selected as main points; the group C by oral administration of Fluoxetine plus electroacupunctue. HAMD depression scale was used for assessment of clinical therapeutic effect and TESS adverse reaction scale was used for adverse reactions. RESULTS: The clinical effective rate was 78.3% in the group A, 82.6% in the group B and 91.7% in the group C, with significant differences between group C and A, group C and B (P < 0.05). Groups B and C had significant therapeutic effects in improvement of physical symptoms, and the adverse reaction of Fluoxetine in the group C was less than that in the group A. CONCLUSION: Electroacupuncture can significantly improve physical symptoms and relieve adverse reactions of Fluoxetine. Electroacupuncture combined with Fluoxetine has a better therapeutic effect on depression with mild or moderate physical symptoms, with less adverse reactions.