Value analysis of postoperative staging imaging for asymptomatic,early-stage breast cancer: implications of clinical variation on utility and cost |
| |
Authors: | Andrew C. PelletMujde Z. Erten Ph.D. Ted A. James |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Given Building, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ![]()
BackgroundRoutine staging imaging for early-stage breast cancer is not recommended. Despite this, there is clinical practice variation with imaging studies obtained for asymptomatic patients with a positive sentinel node (SN+). We characterize the utility, cost, and clinical implications of imaging studies obtained in asymptomatic SN+ patients.MethodsA retrospective review was performed of asymptomatic, clinically node-negative patients who were found to have a positive sentinel node after surgery. The type of imaging, subsequent tests/interventions, frequency of additional malignancy detected, and costs were recorded.ResultsFrom April 2009 to April 2013, a total of 50 of 113 (44%) asymptomatic patients underwent staging imaging for a positive sentinel node; 11 (22%) patients had at least 1 subsequent imaging study or diagnostic intervention. No instance of metastatic breast cancer was identified, with a total cost of imaging calculated at $116,905.ConclusionsStaging imaging for asymptomatic SN+ breast cancer demonstrates clinical variation. These tests were associated with low utility, increased costs, and frequent false positives leading to subsequent testing/intervention. Evidence-based standardization may help increase quality by decreasing unnecessary variation and cost. |
| |
Keywords: | Breast cancer Quality Value Cost Imaging Clinical variation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|