首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同取穴治疗肩周炎疗效对比
引用本文:邱晓虎,谢昆,谢晓焜. 不同取穴治疗肩周炎疗效对比[J]. 中国针灸, 2003, 23(11): 656-658
作者姓名:邱晓虎  谢昆  谢晓焜
作者单位:龙岩人民医院,福建,364000
摘    要:目的 :探讨治疗肩周炎的不同取穴方法。方法 :治疗组 50例 ,通过动诊结合局部组织解剖与病灶特点取穴 ;对照组 41例 ,采用传统循经取穴的方法。结果 :治疗组治愈率 66 0 % ,愈显率90 0 % ;对照组治愈率 34 1 % ,愈显率 73 1 %。两组治愈率及治愈者所需疗次间差异有非常显著性意义 (P <0 0 1 ) ,愈显率间差异有显著性意义 (P <0 0 5)。结论 :动诊及局部组织解剖特点相结合的取穴方法疗效较好

关 键 词:取穴 治疗 肩周炎 疗效对比 电针
文章编号:0255-2930(2003)11-0656-02
修稿时间:2003-01-03

Therapeutic effects of electroacupuncture based on different acupoint selection methods on periarthritis of shoulder
Qiu Xiaohu,Xie Kun,Xie Xiaokun. Therapeutic effects of electroacupuncture based on different acupoint selection methods on periarthritis of shoulder[J]. Chinese acupuncture & moxibustion, 2003, 23(11): 656-658
Authors:Qiu Xiaohu  Xie Kun  Xie Xiaokun
Abstract:Objective To explore different acupoint selection m ethods for treatment of periarthritis of shoulder. Methods The treatment group (n=50) were treated by acupoint selection methods according to motor-diagnosis combined with local tissue anat omy. The control group (n=41) were treated by traditional acupoint selection method. Their therapeutic effects were compared. Results The cured rate and cure-markedly effective rate were 6 6 0% and 90 0% in the treatment group, and 34 1% and 73 1% in the control gr oup, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the cured rate and the needed treatment times for the cured cases (P<0 01), and in the cured-markedly effective rate (P<0 05). Conclusion The treatment group in the therapeutic effect is better than the control g roup with rapider effect.
Keywords:Electroacupuncture  Selecting Point  Frozen Shoulder/acup-mox ther
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国针灸》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国针灸》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号