首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

高原肺水肿不同治疗方案的疗效比较及其规范化治疗初步探讨
引用本文:李素芝,郑必海,闫春城,王宇亮,郑建保,陈彬,廖国云,董学文,杨定周,鲁茸七林.高原肺水肿不同治疗方案的疗效比较及其规范化治疗初步探讨[J].西南国防医药,2010,20(7):771-774.
作者姓名:李素芝  郑必海  闫春城  王宇亮  郑建保  陈彬  廖国云  董学文  杨定周  鲁茸七林
作者单位:1. 西藏军区总医院全军高山病中心,拉萨,850007
2. 西藏军区总医院干部病房,拉萨,850007
3. 西藏军区总医院心脏内分泌科,拉萨,850007
摘    要:目的通过高原肺水肿(HAPE)不同治疗方案的疗效比较,对其规范化治疗进行初步探讨。方法将400例HAPE患者或随机分为A、B、C、D4组,A组给予吸氧、地塞米松、氨茶碱治疗,B组在A组基础上给予速尿治疗,C组在A组基础上给予硝苯地平治疗,D组在A组基础上给予左旋精氨酸治疗,并对4组的治疗效果及安全性(包括副作用及肝肾功能)进行综合评价,对其中安全、疗效显著的一组治疗方案进行规范化。结果 4种治疗方案对HAPE均具有明显的治疗作用,通过对其临床症状消失时间、体征消失时间、肺部X线阴影消失时间及住院时间比较,B组均显著低于A组、C组及D组(P〈0.01或P〈0.05),A组、C组及D组之间相互比较无显著差异;4种治疗方案安全性比较,C组副作用发生率显著高于A组、B组及D组(P〈0.01),A组、B组及D组之间副作用及4组肝肾功能之间比较均无显著差异。结论以吸氧、地塞米松、氨茶碱、速尿组成的HAPE治疗方案具有使用方便、高效、安全的特点,可作为HAPE规范化治疗方案加以推广。

关 键 词:高原肺水肿  治疗  规范化

Four therapeutic regimens for high altitude pulmonary edema: result comparison and preliminary study of standardized treatment
Li Suzhi,Zheng Bihai,Yan Chuncheng,Wang Yuliang,Zheng Jianbao,Chen Bin,Liao Guoyun,Dong Xuewen,Yang Dingzhou,Lurongqilin.Four therapeutic regimens for high altitude pulmonary edema: result comparison and preliminary study of standardized treatment[J].Medical Journal of National Defending forces in Southwest China,2010,20(7):771-774.
Authors:Li Suzhi  Zheng Bihai  Yan Chuncheng  Wang Yuliang  Zheng Jianbao  Chen Bin  Liao Guoyun  Dong Xuewen  Yang Dingzhou  Lurongqilin
Institution:Li Suzhi , Zheng Bihai ,Yan Chuncheng , Wang Yuliang , Zheng Jianbao , Chen Bin3 , Liao Guoyun , Dong Xuewen , Yang Dingzhou , Lurongqilin General Hospital of Tibet Military Command: 1. Mountain Disease Center of PLA, 2. Cadre Ward, 3. Department of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Lhasa, Tibet, 850007, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the standardized treatment of high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) through the comparison of therapeutic effects among different treatment plans. Methods 400 patients with HAPE were randomly divided into group A,B,C and D. Group A was given oxygen inhalation, dexamethasone and aminophylline; group B, C and D was given furosemide, nifedipine and l - arginine, respectively, besides the above treatments in group A. Then the therapeutic effects and safety including side effects ,hepatic and renal function were evaluated comprehensively. The relative safe and effective regimen was singled out for the standardization eventually. Results All of four regimens showed obvious effects on HAPE. The extinction time of clinical symptoms, physical signs and X - ray shades as well as hospital day were significantly shorter in group B than those in group A, C and D( P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01 ) , whereas there were no differences among other three groups. The incidence of side effects was significantly higher in group C than that in other three groups ( P 〈 0.01 ) , whereas neither significant differences of side effects were found among other three groups,nor significant differences in hepatic and renal function were found among the four groups. Conclusion The therapeutic regimen consisting of oxygen inhalation, dexamethasone, furosemide and aminophylline for HAPE is convenient, highly effective and safe. It can be used as the standard therapeutic regimen for HAPE.
Keywords:high altitude pulmonary edema  treatment  standardization
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号