Cholecystectomy with and without drainage: A randomized,prospective study of 300 patients |
| |
Authors: | Daniel C. Budd Robert C. Cochran William J. Fouty |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Paterson, New Jersey, USA;2. Bethesda, Maryland, USA;3. Washington, D.C., USA |
| |
Abstract: | A randomized, prospective study of 300 cholecystectomies was undertaken to evaluate the merits of drainage through a standard Penrose or Chaffin-Pratt sump tube matched against no drainage at all. There was no difference in mortality or length of hospital stay. There was, however, a significantly higher incidence of postoperative pyrexia due to atelectasis and wound infection in the drainage groups. Neither drain fulfilled its objective of providing outflow for a subhepatic collection, thus avoiding bile peritonitis. This study suggests that surgical drainage after every uncomplicated cholecystectomy is unnecessary and unwise. |
| |
Keywords: | Requests for reprints should be addressed to Daniel C. Budd MD Department of Surgery National Naval Medical Center Bethesda Maryland. |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|