Preoperative Staging With 11C-Choline PET/CT Is Adequately Accurate in Patients With Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer |
| |
Authors: | Riccardo Schiavina Lorenzo Bianchi Federico Mineo Bianchi Marco Borghesi Cristian Vincenzo Pultrone Hussam Dababneh Paolo Castellucci Francesco Ceci Cristina Nanni Caterina Gaudiano Michelangelo Fiorentino Angelo Porreca Francesco Chessa Andrea Minervini Stefano Fanti Eugenio Brunocilla |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Urology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy;2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy;3. Department of Radiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy;4. Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), “F. Addarii” Institute of Oncology and Transplant Pathology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy;5. Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Cardio-Nephro-Thoracic Sciences Doctorate, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy;6. Department of Urology, Abano Terme Hospital, Padua, Italy;7. Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for nodal staging of prostate cancer (PCa) in different populations of high-risk patients.Patients and MethodsWe evaluated 262 individuals with intermediate- or high-risk PCa submitted to radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Within men with high-risk disease, we identified a subgroup of individuals harboring very high-risk (VHR, n = 28) disease: clinical stage ≥ T2c and more than 5 cores with Gleason score 8-10; primary biopsy Gleason score of 5; 3 high-risk features; or prostate-specific antigen ≥ 30 ng/mL. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) was assessed after stratifying patients according to risk group classification on a patient- and anatomic region–based analysis.ResultsOn patient-based analysis, considering high-risk patients (n = 155), 11C-choline PET/CT versus CECT had sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 76% versus 21% and 92%, respectively. Considering VHR men as separate subgroups (n = 28), 11C-choline PET/CT versus CECT had sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 93% versus 25% and 79%, respectively. Accordingly, in the VHR category, the area under the curve of 11C-choline PET/CT versus CECT was 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.0) versus 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.86), respectively. On anatomic region–based analysis, considering the VHR group, 11C-choline PET/CT versus CECT had sensitivity and specificity of 70.6% and 95.5% versus 35.3% and 98.5%, respectively.ConclusionPatients with VHR characteristics could represent the ideal candidate to undergo disease staging with PET/CT before surgery with the highest cost efficacy. |
| |
Keywords: | Choline PET/CT Histology confirmation Nodal staging Prostate cancer Radical prostatectomy |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|