首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Preoperative Staging With 11C-Choline PET/CT Is Adequately Accurate in Patients With Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer
Authors:Riccardo Schiavina  Lorenzo Bianchi  Federico Mineo Bianchi  Marco Borghesi  Cristian Vincenzo Pultrone  Hussam Dababneh  Paolo Castellucci  Francesco Ceci  Cristina Nanni  Caterina Gaudiano  Michelangelo Fiorentino  Angelo Porreca  Francesco Chessa  Andrea Minervini  Stefano Fanti  Eugenio Brunocilla
Affiliation:1. Department of Urology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy;2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy;3. Department of Radiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy;4. Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), “F. Addarii” Institute of Oncology and Transplant Pathology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy;5. Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Cardio-Nephro-Thoracic Sciences Doctorate, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy;6. Department of Urology, Abano Terme Hospital, Padua, Italy;7. Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
Abstract:

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for nodal staging of prostate cancer (PCa) in different populations of high-risk patients.

Patients and Methods

We evaluated 262 individuals with intermediate- or high-risk PCa submitted to radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Within men with high-risk disease, we identified a subgroup of individuals harboring very high-risk (VHR, n = 28) disease: clinical stage ≥ T2c and more than 5 cores with Gleason score 8-10; primary biopsy Gleason score of 5; 3 high-risk features; or prostate-specific antigen ≥ 30 ng/mL. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) was assessed after stratifying patients according to risk group classification on a patient- and anatomic region–based analysis.

Results

On patient-based analysis, considering high-risk patients (n = 155), 11C-choline PET/CT versus CECT had sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 76% versus 21% and 92%, respectively. Considering VHR men as separate subgroups (n = 28), 11C-choline PET/CT versus CECT had sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 93% versus 25% and 79%, respectively. Accordingly, in the VHR category, the area under the curve of 11C-choline PET/CT versus CECT was 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.0) versus 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.86), respectively. On anatomic region–based analysis, considering the VHR group, 11C-choline PET/CT versus CECT had sensitivity and specificity of 70.6% and 95.5% versus 35.3% and 98.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients with VHR characteristics could represent the ideal candidate to undergo disease staging with PET/CT before surgery with the highest cost efficacy.
Keywords:Choline PET/CT  Histology confirmation  Nodal staging  Prostate cancer  Radical prostatectomy
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号