首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

弱视儿童不同部位记录视觉诱发电位比较
引用本文:左桂金,赵洪奎,郭红梅.弱视儿童不同部位记录视觉诱发电位比较[J].临床神经电生理学杂志,1997(3).
作者姓名:左桂金  赵洪奎  郭红梅
作者单位:北京军区总医院肌电图室
摘    要:目的对弱视儿童不同部位所记录的视觉诱发电位(VEP)进行比较研究。方法分析52只弱视眼常规视觉刺激时于O1、O2、Oz三点记录的VEP,并以66只健康眼的VEP作比较。结果弱视眼三个点VEP的异常率:Oz一个点23%,O1、O2两点为75%,Oz、O1和O2三个点为81%。与正常眼比较,弱视眼此三点VEP的潜伏期均显著延长,Oz点波幅显著降低,O1、O2点波幅则无显著差异。弱视眼的VEPO1和O2点潜伏期较其Oz点显著延长,波幅亦显著降低。结论对VEP的评价,必须考虑到有无弱视和记录部位这两个因素。

关 键 词:儿童  弱视  视觉诱发电位

The clinical meaning of different recording method on the VEP in the amblyopic children.
Zuo Guijin,Zhao Hongkui,Guo Hongmei.The clinical meaning of different recording method on the VEP in the amblyopic children.[J].Journal of Clinical Electroneurophysiology,1997(3).
Authors:Zuo Guijin  Zhao Hongkui  Guo Hongmei
Abstract:Objective To compare the different recording method on the visual evoked potential (VEP) in the amblyopic children. Methods To measured 66 normal eyes to get three standard values of VEP, and analysed 52 amblyopic eyes in different recording sites of VEP Results The abnormality rate in Oz was 23%, O 1,O 2 was 75%,O 1,O 2, Oz was 81% The latency of O 1,O 2, Oz in amblyopic eyes was longer than that of normal eyes; the amplitude of Oz in amblyopic eyes was lower than that of normal eyes but the amplitude of O 1,O 2 was no significant difference than that of normal eyes The latency of O 1,O 2, in amblyopic eyes was longer than Oz,while the amplitude was lower than Oz Conclusions The factors both existence of amblgopic and recording sites must be considered for the evaluate of VEP
Keywords:Children  Amblyopia  Visual evoked potentials
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号