Management of incidental pituitary tumors |
| |
Authors: | Nicholas F. Marko Robert J. Weil |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Section of Computational Biology, Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Cambridge Research Institute (CRI) and Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics (DAMTP), Cambridge University, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK;(2) Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, The Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Mail Desk: ND4-40 LRI, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Pituitary incidentalomas are common lesions for which neurosurgical referrals may become progressively more frequent, given
the increasing application of neuroimaging. The initial evaluation of a patient with radiographic evidence of an incidentaloma
should focus on addressing two questions: (1) is the lesion causing neurological symptoms, and (2) is the lesion hormonally
active? The answers to these two questions provide a framework for subsequent clinical management. The initial patient assessment
should include a detailed history and physical examination, including the bedside assessment of visual fields. High-quality
MRI imaging is essential, and formal visual field testing should be obtained in patients where the lesion abuts or compresses
the optic apparatus. The initial biochemical workup is intended to assess potential pituitary hypo- or hyperfunction and should
include measurement of serum levels of prolactin, insulin-like growth factor type-1, free thyroxine, testosterone, and an
assessment of axis hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis function. Additional testing may include serum thyroid-stimulating
hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone levels. Neurologically-asymptomatic patients without endocrine
dysfunction can be managed with observation at regular intervals, including MRI imaging at 6 months and 1 year and then annually
for a period of 3 years. Follow-up biochemical assessment is not necessary in the absence of clinical symptoms or radiographic
enlargement of the lesion. After 3 years the follow-up interval may be prolonged, although closer follow-up may be indicated
for patients with lesions ≥1 cm. Most patients who either present with or who subsequently develop neurologic or endocrinologic
symptoms should be considered for surgery as the first-line therapy. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|