首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

X -刀联合介入栓塞治疗原发性肝癌近期疗效观察
引用本文:狄杰,王强,亓飞.X -刀联合介入栓塞治疗原发性肝癌近期疗效观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2017(2):237-240.
作者姓名:狄杰  王强  亓飞
作者单位:山东新汶矿业集团莱芜中心医院肿瘤科,山东 莱芜,271103
摘    要:目的:探讨经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)结合立体定向体部 X -刀治疗肝癌的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析我院2012年3月-2013年11月治疗的原发性肝癌患者96例的临床资料,随机分成三组,X -刀组、TACE 组以及联合组(X -刀联合 TACE)各32例。观察指标主要包括:客观疗效、甲胎球蛋白(AFP)、肝脏功能(ALT,AST)、肾脏功能(BUN,Cr)、毒副反应、生存时间。结果:所选择的各分类病人的一般资料对比情况,包括性别、乙肝表面抗原状况及 Child -pugh 评分(A /B)等方面,其差异不具有统计学意义(P >0.05),具有可比性。近期疗效情况:治疗结束1月后,与单纯的 TACE 组相对比,单纯 X -刀治疗组病人总体有效率差异无统计学意义(有效率:28.13% vs 21.88%,P =0.564);与单纯 TACE 治疗组比较,联合治疗组病人总的有效率显著升高,差异具有统计学意义(有效率:46.88% vs 21.88%,P =0.035)。生存时间:联合组、单纯 X -刀组、单纯 TACE 组三组的生存时间分别为(13.2±2.6)个月、(8.8±2.2)个月、(5.8±2.1)个月。联合组与单纯 TACE 组及单纯 X -刀组比较,生存时间有所延长,差异具有统计学意义。治疗结束1月后与单纯 TACE组比较,联合治疗组病人卡氏评分高,差异具有统计学意义(t =2.18,P =0.0331)。三组治疗后肝、肾脏功能均较本组病人治疗前改善,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);三组病人治疗后肝肾功能组间相比较无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论:TACE 与 X -刀治疗相结合的方法治疗原发性肝癌在临床上有着显著的疗效,较单纯TACE 治疗组能起到更为有效的抑制和杀伤肿瘤的作用。TACE 与 X -刀治疗方法相结合无疑较单纯 TACE治疗组和单纯 X -刀治疗组能更好的改善患者的近期生存质量,并且能在一定程度上延长患者的生存时间,不失为是一种风险低、临床有效率高、并发症并不增多的有效治疗方案之一。TACE 与 X -刀治疗相结合的治疗方案治疗原发性肝癌较单纯 TACE 治疗组和单纯 X -刀治疗组对胃肠道功能以及肾脏机能损害减小,并且患者能够耐受,并发症风险低。

关 键 词:原发性肝癌  X  -刀  TACE  疗效  安全性

Recent curative effect of X -knife with TACE on the primary liver cancer
Di Jie,Wang Qiang,Qi Fei.Recent curative effect of X -knife with TACE on the primary liver cancer[J].Journal of Modern Oncology,2017(2):237-240.
Authors:Di Jie  Wang Qiang  Qi Fei
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the clinical efficacy of conventional TACE combined with stereotactic body X knife treatment on liver cancer.Methods:Retrospectively analyze data of 96 primary liver cancer patients who were randomly divided into three groups,X -knife group,TACE group,X -knife combined with TACE group,32 cases in each.Observation indicators mainly include objective effect,AFP,ALT,AST,kidney (BUN,Cr),side effects,and sur-vival.Results:General date of three groups of patients,including gender,HBSAg (+),and the Child -pugh score (A /B)were compared,the difference had no statistical significance (P >0.05).After 4 week's treatment,curative effects were compared among three groups.The difference between X - knife group and conventional TACE alone group was not statistically significant (incidences of efficiency:28.13% vs 21.88%,P >0.05).Joint group had bet-ter curative effects than conventional TACE group,with statistical differences between two groups(incidences of effi-ciency:46.88% vs 21.88%,P <0.05).The survival time of joint group,simple X -knife,TACE alone group were (13.2 ±2.6)months,(8.8 ±2.2)months,(5.8 ±2.1)months.Survival time of joint group was prolonged com-pared with X -knife group and conventional TACE alone group,the difference was statistically significant.Joint group had a high score of KPS after treatment.Liver and kidney function of all the three groups were improved than before the treatment (P <0.05).There was no significant difference (P >0.05)among the liver and kidney function of three groups after the treatment.Conclusion:Combined with conventional X -knife treatment of primary liver cancer treatment has obvious curative effect,more effective than conventional TACE group.Combined with conventional X -knife treatment for primary liver cancer than conventional treatment group and X -knife can improve the patient's quality of life,prolong patient survival.
Keywords:primary liver cancer  X -knife  conventional TACE  curative effect  safety
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号