Effect of smear layer removal agents on the microhardness and roughness of radicular dentin |
| |
Authors: | Hosea Lalrin Muana Mohannad Nassar Ahmad Dargham Noriko Hiraishi Junji Tagami |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan;2. Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates;3. RAK College of Dental Sciences (RAKCODS), RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() PurposeTo evaluate the effect of phytic acid (IP6) on the surface roughness and microhardness of human root canal dentin and compare it to other smear layer removal agents.Materials and methodsFifty extracted human maxillary incisors were sectioned longitudinally into a total of 100 specimens followed by embedding in auto-polymerizing acrylic resin. The specimens were polished and then randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the test solution used to condition root canal dentin: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); 10% citric acid (CA); 1% IP6; 37% phosphoric acid (PA); or distilled water (control group). Each specimen was treated with a total volume of 1 ml of each solution for 1 min with agitation. Each group was then divided into two subgroups of 10 specimens each. The specimens of the first subgroup were used to determine microhardness, using Vickers hardness tester, and the specimens of the second subgroup were used to measure surface roughness, using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests, α = 0.05.ResultsAll the tested groups exhibited microhardness and surface roughness values that were statistically significantly different when compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The microhardness value obtained with IP6 was significantly lower when compared to EDTA, CA, and the control group, whereas its roughness value was significantly higher compared to the aforementioned groups. However, there was no significant difference between IP6 and PA (P > 0.05).ConclusionsIP6 and PA showed the lowest microhardness and the highest surface roughness values. |
| |
Keywords: | Citric acid EDTA Microhardness Phosphoric acid Phytic acid Roughness |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|