课程及教师评估问卷CAPE的信度及效度分析 |
| |
引用本文: | 刘佳佳,曹枫林,程培霞,陈倩倩. 课程及教师评估问卷CAPE的信度及效度分析[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2010, 0(11): 45-46,91 |
| |
作者姓名: | 刘佳佳 曹枫林 程培霞 陈倩倩 |
| |
作者单位: | 山东大学护理学院,山东,济南,250012 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:考察CAPE中文版的信度和效度。方法:随机抽取了山东大学护理学院大一至大四年级的7门课程,进行CAPE问卷的信度和效度分析。对其中一门课程的30名学生间隔2周重测,评定重测信度。结果:CAPE中文版的Cronbachα系数为0.91;重测信度为0.75,P〈0.01。主成分分析共提取3个因子,解释变异量的59.28%。结论:CAPE的信度、效度均较理想,可加以推广应用,但研究取样较局限,仍需进一步研究分析。
|
关 键 词: | 教学评估 信度 效度 |
Chinese version of course and professor evaluations:Reliability and validity |
| |
Affiliation: | LIU Jia-jia,CAO Feng-lin,CHENG Pei-xia,et al(Nursing School of Shandong University,Jinan 250012,Shandong,China) |
| |
Abstract: | Objective:To develop the Chinese version of the course and professor evaluation and examine its reliability and validity.Methods:Seven courses were randomly selected from freshmen to senior.The internal consistency reliability,test-retest reliability were examined.A factor analysis procedure was used to explore the factor structure of course and professor evaluation.Results:The Cronbachα was 0.91,and the test-retest reliability was 0.75,P0.01.Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 components,which accounted for 59.28% of the explained variance.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the course and professor evaluation is a reliable and valid instrument for education evaluation. |
| |
Keywords: | educational evaluation reliability validity |
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|