首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Heterotopic Ossification following acetabular fixation: Incidence and risk factors: 10-year experience of a tertiary centre
Affiliation:1. National Centre for Pelvic & Acetabular Surgery, The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Incorporating the National Children''s Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland;2. Department of Psychiatry, University College Dublin, Ireland;1. The Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute Center for Health Policy, 1215 21st Avenue South, Suite 4200, Medical Center East, South Tower, Nashville, TN 37232, United States;2. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 1685 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53704, United States;1. AO Research Institute Davos, Davos Platz, Switzerland;2. Medical Faculty, Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;1. Department for Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, BG Trauma Center Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany;2. Department for Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Germany;1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Sun Hospital, Daejeon, Korea;2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea;1. University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South Building 29A, Pavilion III – 2nd Floor Orange, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA;2. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
Abstract:
BackgroundHeterotopic Ossification (HO) is a well-recognized complication following acetabular fracture fixation and its presence is prognostic for suboptimal clinical outcome. There are many controversies pertaining to its aetiology, including surgical approach, associated injuries and the use of HO prophylaxis. Long term data from high volume centres is necessary to address these issues.AimTo determine the incidence of HO post open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabular fractures and to examine the associated risk and prognostic factors.MethodWe studied a cohort of 369 consecutive acetabular fractures that underwent ORIF at our institution over a 10 year period. Data was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.ResultsThe existence of HO was evident in 65 patients (17.62%), of these 39 (60.0%) were Class I, 16 (24.6%) were Class II, 8 (12.3%) were Class III, and 2 (3.1%) were Class IV according to Brooker Classification. We found a significant association between admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (P-value = 0.039), chest injury (P-value = 0.013), multiple fractures (P-value = 0.005), and the time lapse between injury and operation (P-value = 0.025), and some statistical significance with surgical approach, ipsilateral fractures, open fractures, tibial and patellar fractures. Age over 30 years as the only prognostic factor for severe HO. Prophylaxis with Indomethacin did not appear to confer any benefit in our patient group.ConclusionThe risk factors for developing HO following acetabular fracture fixation are multifactorial and include admission to ICU, associated chest injuries, multiple fractures and delay between injury and surgery. Surgical approach, ipsilateral fractures and tibia and patellar fractures may also play a role. Age over thirty years was the only prognostic factor for developing severe HO.
Keywords:Acetabular fractures  National Referral Centre  Heterotopic Ossification
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号