腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与改良Kugel疝修补术的临床对比分析

目的：比较腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）和改良Kugel疝修补术（Modify-Ku-gel）治疗腹股沟疝的安全性与有效性。方法回顾性分析我院2009年6月至2011年6月行腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术284例（312例次）患者的临床资料，其中TEP134例（152例次），改良Kugel疝修补术150例（160例次）。比较两组平均手术时间、术后平均住院时间、术后并发症及术后复发。结果平均手术时间TEP组（48．75±12．14）min，改良Kugel组（51．46±24．76）min，两组间差异无统计学意义（P＝0．248）。术后平均住院时间 TEP 组为（5．23±1．85）d，改良 Kugel 组为（5．84±1．52）d，两者差异无统计学意义（P＝0．126）。术后并发症TEP组5例（3．3％），改良Kugel组8例（5．0％），两者差异无统计学意义（P＝0．598），TEP组复发1例（0．7％），改良Kugel组复发2例（1．3％），两者差异无统计学意义（P＝1．00）。结论 TEP与改良Kugel术均为腹膜前疝修补手术，能完全修补腹股沟区耻骨肌孔的缺损，并且安全，有效，值得在临床推广。

Clinical comparison of endoscopic total extraperitoneal patchplasty and modified Kugel hernioplas-ty

Objective To compare the safety and efficiency of endoscopic total extraperitoneal patchplasty（TEP）and modified Kugel hernioplasty for inguinal hernia.Methods The clinical data of 284 cases（312 surgeries）of preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair,including 134 cases（152 surgeries）of TEP and 150 cases （160 surgeries）of modified Kugel hernioplasty,were retrospectively evaluated from June 2009 to June 2011.Mean operative time,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative complications and recur-rence were compared between groups.Results There were no significant differences in mean operative time （48.75 ±12.14）min vs（51.46 ±24.76）min,P=0.248],postoperative hospital stay （5.23 ± 1.85）d vs（5.84 ±1.52）,P=0.126],postoperative complications 5 cases（3.3%）vs 8 cases（5.0%）, P=0.598]and recurrence 1 case（0.7%）vs 2 cases（1.3%）,P=1.00]between TEP and modified Kugel hernioplasty,espectively.Conclusion TEP and modified Kugel hernioplasty are both methods for preperitoneal hernia repair and they can completely repair the defect of myopectineal orifice.They are safe and effective,which is worthy of being spread in clinical practice.