首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

胎儿唇腭裂的MRI表现
引用本文:王光彬,陈立光,朱向玉,王翠艳,张迎华,王丽娟,李慧华,邱秀玲,曲蕾,魏煜龙,丁蕊,孙雪芹. 胎儿唇腭裂的MRI表现[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2010, 44(2). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.02.011
作者姓名:王光彬  陈立光  朱向玉  王翠艳  张迎华  王丽娟  李慧华  邱秀玲  曲蕾  魏煜龙  丁蕊  孙雪芹
作者单位:山东省医学影像学研究所,济南,250021
摘    要:
目的 探讨MRI诊断胎儿唇腭裂的征象及其优缺点.方法 对12例超声怀疑胎儿唇腭裂的孕妇进行胎儿MR检查,并将超声、MRI及随访结果进行对照.结果 12例孕妇,检出胎儿12例,随访结果显示1例为不完全型唇裂、11例为完全唇裂并合并腭裂.B超和MRI诊断唇裂的结果与随访一致.胎儿唇裂的MRI表现为胎儿唇部软组织连续性不完全或完全中断,内充填羊水,T2WI呈高信号.腭裂的MRI表现为胎儿腭部组织信号不连续、局部被长T_2高信号中断,口腔与鼻腔直接相通.MRI漏诊腭裂1例,正确诊断腭裂10例,正确排除腭裂1例,诊断正确率为91.7%(11/12),敏感度为90.9%(10/11),特异度为100%(1/1);B超诊断腭裂5例,正确排除腭裂1例,漏诊6例,诊断正确率为50.0%(6/12),敏感度为45.5%(5/11),特异度为100%(1/1).结论 MRI对于腭裂的诊断较B超有一定优势,在超声或其他检查怀疑胎儿有腭裂时,有必要进一步进行MR检查.

关 键 词:胎儿  唇裂  磁共振成像  腭裂

MRI findings of fetal cleft lip and palate
WANG Guang-bin,CHEN Li-guang,ZHU Xiang-yu,WANG Cui-yan,ZHANG Ying-hua,WANG Li-juan,LI Hui-hua,QIU Xiu-ling,QU Lei,WEI Yu-long,DING Rui,SUN Xue-qin. MRI findings of fetal cleft lip and palate[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2010, 44(2). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.02.011
Authors:WANG Guang-bin  CHEN Li-guang  ZHU Xiang-yu  WANG Cui-yan  ZHANG Ying-hua  WANG Li-juan  LI Hui-hua  QIU Xiu-ling  QU Lei  WEI Yu-long  DING Rui  SUN Xue-qin
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the MR findings of fetal cleft lip (CL) and evaluate the advantages and limitations of MRI in the diagnosis. Methods Twelve pregnant women suspicious of fetal CL/cleft palate(CP) on ultrasonography were enrolled in the study. The findings of ultrasonography, MRI and following-up were compared. Results MRI and ultrasonography detected 12 fetuses with CL/CP. The following-up results showed 1 case with incomplete cleft lip and the other 11 cases with complete cleft lips and cleft palates. MRI and unltrasonography were consistent with the follow-up in CL detection, showing completed or uncompleted soft tissue interruption of the fetal lips with amniotic fluid filling which is high signal on T_2WI. On MRI, CP showed discontinuous of the soft tissue which were interrupted by long T_2 signal and communicating with oral cavity and nasal cavity. MRI missed 1 case and excluded 1 case of CP. Ultrasonography predicted 5 case of CL, excluded 1 CP but missed 6 cases. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in detection CL/CP was 91.7% (11/12), 90.9% (10/11), 100% (1/1) for MRI and 50.0% (6/12),45.5% (5/11), 100% (1/1) for ultrasonography, respectively. Conclusion MR imaging had advantage over ultrasonography in detecting CP, MRI is an essential when CP is suspicious on ultrasonography.
Keywords:Fetus  Cleft lip  Magnetic resonance imaging  Cleft palate
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号