首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Cabergoline compared to levodopa in the treatment of patients with severe restless legs syndrome: results from a multi-center, randomized, active controlled trial.
Authors:Claudia Trenkwalder MD  Heike Benes MD  Ludger Grote MD  Svenja Happe MD  Birgit Högl MD  Johannes Mathis MD  Gerda M. Saletu‐Zyhlarz MD  Ralf Kohnen PhD  CALDIR study group
Affiliation:1. Paracelsus‐Elena Hospital, University of G?ttingen, Kassel, GermanyParacelsus‐Elena Klinik, Klinikstrasse 16, 34128 Kassel, Germany;2. Somni bene Institute for Clinical Research and Sleep Medicine, Schwerin, Germany;3. Neurology Department, University of Rostock, Germany;4. Department for Pulmonary Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska Sjukhuset, Gothenburg, Sweden;5. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Goettingen, Germany;6. Klinikum Bremen‐Ost, Bremen, Germany;7. Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria;8. Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland;9. University Hospital for Psychiatry, Vienna, Austria;10. IMEREM Institute for Medical Research Management and Biometrics, Nuremberg, Germany;11. CALDIR = CAbergoline versus L‐Dopa In RLS
Abstract:
We report the first large-scale double-blind, randomly assigned study to compare two active dopaminergic therapies for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), the dopamine agonist cabergoline (CAB) and levodopa/benserazide (levodopa). Patients with idiopathic RLS were treated with fixed daily doses of 2 or 3 mg CAB or 200 or 300 mg levodopa for 30 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the IRLS (International RLS Severity Scale) and by time to discontinuation of treatment due to loss of efficacy or augmentation. 361 of 418 screened patients (age 58 +/- 12 years, 71% females) were randomly assigned and treated (CAB: n = 178; levodopa: n = 183) in 51 centers of four European countries. Baseline IRLS total score was 25.7 +/- 6.8. The baseline-adjusted mean change from baseline to week 6 in IRLS sum score was d = -16.1 in the CAB group and d = -9.5 in the levodopa group (d = -6.6, P < 0.0001). More patients in the levodopa group (24.0%) than in the CAB group (11.9%, P = 0.0029, log-rank test) discontinued because of loss of efficacy (14.2% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.0290) or augmentation (9.8% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.0412). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 83.1% of the CAB group and in 77.6% of the levodopa group. In both groups, most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal symptoms (CAB: 55.6%, levodopa: 30.6%, P < 0.0001). This first large-scale active controlled study in RLS showed superior efficacy of cabergoline versus levodopa after a 30-week long-term therapy. Tolerability was found more favorable with levodopa than with cabergoline.
Keywords:restless legs syndrome  therapy  cabergoline  levodopa  augmentation
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号