Pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel administered in combination with cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin in patients with advanced solid tumours |
| |
Authors: | Vinodh R. Nannan Panday Ronald de Wit Jan H. Schornagel Margaret Schot Hilde Rosing Jan Lieverst Wim W. ten Bokkel Huinink Jan H. M. Schellens Jos H. Beijnen |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, NL;(2) Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, NL;(3) Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, State University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, NL;(4) Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Slotervaart Hospital, Louwesweg 6, 1066 EC Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: apvnp@slz.nl Tel.: +31-20-512-4737; Fax: +31-20-512-4753, NL |
| |
Abstract: | Purpose: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and cisplatin administered in combination with bleomycin and etoposide and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in patients with advanced solid tumours. Methods: Patients were recruited to a phase I trial where escalating doses of paclitaxel (125 to 200 mg/m2) were administered in combination with etoposide 100 or 120 mg/m2, and fixed dose of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and bleomycin 30 mg, with the concomitant use of G-CSF. Paclitaxel (3-h infusion) was followed by 1-h etoposide, 4-h cisplatin and 30-min bleomycin infusions, respectively. Pharmacokinetics sampling for paclitaxel analysis was performed in ten patients from dose levels II–V. Results: The mean paclitaxel area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curves (AUC) for the 125-mg/m2 dose level (II) was 7.0 ± 3.6 h μmol−1 l−1, for the 175-mg/m2 dose level (III) 10.6 ± 2.8 h μmol−1 l−1, for the 200-mg/m2 dose level (IV) it was 16.0 ± 5.0 h μmol−1 l−1, and for the 175-mg/m2 dose level (V) it was 12.5 ± 6.1 h μmol−1 l−1. The mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values for dose levels II–V were 1.9 ± 1.1 μmol/l, 3.4 ± 1.2 μmol/l, 4.3 ± 1.0 μmol/l and 3.8 ± 1.2 h μmol/l, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, relevant pharmacokinetic parameters of paclitaxel like AUC, Cmax and the paclitaxel plasma concentration above the pharmacologically relevant 0.1-μmol/l threshold concentration (t > 0.1 μM) when administered in combination with cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin (PEB) were not statistically different from paclitaxel data of historical controls. However, given the trial design, pharmacokinetic interactions between the agents cannot be excluded. Received: 29 June 1998 / Accepted: 29 January 1999 |
| |
Keywords: | Bleomycin Cisplatin Etoposide Paclitaxel Pharmacokinetics |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|