严重急性呼吸综合征所致呼吸衰竭及无创通气治疗

目的　回顾性总结严重急性呼吸综合征 (SARS)并发呼吸衰竭患者的血气特点 ,探讨应用无创正压通气 (NPPV)治疗的策略。方法　 2 0 0 3年 4月 2 2日～ 5月 1日 ,12 0例临床符合SARS诊断标准的患者入住北京地坛医院 (SARS专科医院 )的 4个病区 ,30例患者 (占 2 5 % )在病程中出现呼吸衰竭 ,达到急性肺损伤 (ALI)和 (或 )急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS)的诊断标准。 2 8例应用双水平气道正压通气 (BiPAP)。主要观察指标 :(1)住院期间的血气分析、脉搏容积血氧饱和度 (SpO2 )及呼吸频率 ,特别是上机前、上机后 1h及撤机后的结果 ;(2 )放射学检查或临床提示住院后新出现的气胸、纵隔气肿、心包积气及皮下气肿 ;(3)应用无创通气的天数 ;(4 )需气管插管行有创通气的患者数 ;(5 )患者的病死率 ;(6 )一线医务人员因护理治疗无创通气SARS患者而感染SARS的情况。结果统计 30例患者在整个病程中的动脉血二氧化碳分压 (PaCO2 )变化情况 ,16例 (5 3% )患者出现CO2 潴留 ,PaCO2为 4 5～ 5 6mmHg ,平均 (4 8± 4 )mmHg。NPPV治疗后动脉血氧分压 (PaO2 )、SpO2 、氧合指数及呼吸频率均显著改善 (P均 <0 0 1) ,但pH及PaCO2 的变化并不明显。 18例患者成功撤机 ,应用NPPV的时间为5～ 30d ,平均 (10± 6 )d。除 1例不能耐受BiPAP

Acute respiratory failure and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation treatment in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To describe the blood gas features and short-term outcomes of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) treatment for acute respiratory failure (ARF) in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in this retrospective case series study sought. METHODS: Between April 22 and May 1, 2003, 120 clinically compatible SARS patients were admitted to a special hospital for infectious diseases in Beijing. All patients' records were reviewed. The outcome variables of NPPV therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: At 6 weeks of SARS onset, 25% (30/120) patients had respiratory failure with ALI/ARDS. 16 (53%) had hypercapnia (PaCO(2) > 45 mm Hg) during the course of SARS. 28 of them received NPPV therapy. One was intolerable to NPPV treatment. In the remaining 27 patients, NPPV was initiated 1.2 +/- 1.6 (0 - 10) days after onset of respiratory failure. One hour of NPPV therapy led to significant increases in PaO(2), SpO(2) and PaO(2)/FiO(2), and decrease in respiratory rate (all P < 0.01). 18 of the 27 patients were weaned successfully from NPPV. The mean duration of NPPV use was 10 +/- 6 (5 - 30) days. In addition to one patient who was intolerable to NPPV treatment, intubation was required in other 9 patients who initially had a favorable response to NPPV. Remarkable pulmonary barotrauma was noted in 7 of the 120 (5.8%) patients with SARS, among which 1 developed 2 days after intubation, and 6 occurred while the patients were on NPPV, the incidence being 22% (6/27) in patients using NPPV. The fatality rate at 13 weeks of SARS onset was 6.7% (8/120) in the patient cohort, and 26.7% (8/30) in the ALI/ARDS patients. No SARS occurred in medical staff taking care of NPPV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the SARS patients with ALI/ARDS could experience CO(2) retention, which might be related to the impairment of respiratory muscles. It is proved to be feasible and appropriate for NPPV treatment of respiratory failure in SARS patients who were at high risk of intubation related complications. As there was a high incidence of remarkable barotrauma, a careful lung protective strategy is necessary during the administration of NPPV as well as invasive mechanical ventilation.