首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Combination vinorelbine and capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer using a non-body surface area dosing scheme
Authors:Anne F. Schott  James M. Rae  Kent A. Griffith  Daniel F. Hayes  Vered Sterns  Laurence H. Baker
Affiliation:(1) Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;(2) Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;(3) Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA;(4) Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, C349 MIB, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0848, USA
Abstract:
Purpose: This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose of flat-dosed vinorelbine in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. At the time of study initiation, it was anticipated that vinorelbine would be developed as an oral capsule. A flat dosing scheme of both drugs was used to facilitate development of the oral regimen, and because neither drug’s clearance is associated with body surface area (BSA), pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic endpoints were explored. Experimental Design: Capecitabine was administered orally at 3,000 mg/day on days 1–14. The starting dose of vinorelbine was 20 mg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The vinorelbine dose was escalated until dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Vinorelbine pharmacokinetics were measured after the first dose. Patients underwent genotype analysis for polymorphisms in the CYP3A5 gene, and the erythromycin breath test (ERMBT), a phenotypic test of CYP3A enzyme activity. Results: Twenty five eligible patients were enrolled. Hematologic DLT was seen at the 50 and 45 mg vinorelbine doses; thus the recommended dose is 40 mg on days 1 and 8. Response rate was 30%, and disease stabilization rate was 64% (all dose levels included). Vinorelbine clearance was not associated with ERMBT, BSA, or age. CYP3A5 genotype in this small sample did not have an obvious relationship to clearance or toxicity. Conclusions: A non-BSA based dosing scheme of capecitabine and vinorelbine is safe and efficacious. BSA did not affect vinorelbine clearance. We recommend future studies with capecitabine and/or vinorelbine to compare the safety and efficacy of flat dosed versus BSA-dosed treatment.
Keywords:Clinical pharmacology  Genotype–  phenotype correlations  Phase I clinical trial  Erythromycin breath test
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号