首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

芪参复康胶囊、氟西汀对首发抑郁症患者事件相关电位的影响
引用本文:杨来启,陈玖,杨喜民,林昱,张彦,吴银霞,李新田.芪参复康胶囊、氟西汀对首发抑郁症患者事件相关电位的影响[J].中国医师杂志,2012,14(6):742-745.
作者姓名:杨来启  陈玖  杨喜民  林昱  张彦  吴银霞  李新田
作者单位:中国人民解放军第三医院全军精神病防治中心, 陕西省宝鸡,721004
基金项目:军队中医药科研专项课题
摘    要:目的评价芪参复康胶囊、氟西汀对首发抑郁症患者认知功能的影响。方法将本院63例首发抑郁症患者按随机数字表法分2组,中药组(31例)给予芪参复康胶囊0.2-0.6g口服,3次/d,西药组(32例)给予用氟西汀胶囊(江苏常州制药有限公司生产)20-40(20±5)mg/d,每日晨口服,可酌情短期合用小剂量苯二氮卓类药,不合用其他抗抑郁药。两组患者于治疗前、治疗后6周进行17项HAMD评定及行P300检查,32名健康志愿者(对照组)行P300检查。分析两组患者治疗前后对认知功能的影响。结果(1)两组治疗前HAMD评分比较差异无统计学意义(29.1±5.1)分vs(29.0±4.5)分,P〉0.05],治疗后中药组HAMD评分低于西药组(10.1±3.2)分vs(12.3±3.4)分,P〈0.05],HAMD减分率显著高于西药组(65.6±2.1)%vs(57.9±3.2)%,P〈0.05]。(2)两组治疗前Cz点潜伏期及波幅与对照组比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组治疗后较治疗前的P2、N2、P3的潜伏期均显著缩短P2(152.8±54.1)ms vs(208.9±57.6)ms,(174.5±63.2)ms vs(207.3±55.8)ms;N2(208.7±57.9)ms vs(273.4±62.0)ms,(239.2±59.2)ms vs(275.6±60.8)ms;P3(319.1±60.2)ms vs(396.3±66.3)n18,(315.6±61.1)ms vs(394.7±55.6)ms,P均〈0.05],波幅均显著升高P2(7.8±1.7)μV vs(3.3±1.2)μV,(7.0±1.4)μV vs(3.4±1.4)μV;N2(3.6±1.4)μV vs(1.0±0.7)μV,(2.4±1,3)μV vs(1.2±1.0)μV;P3(9.6±2.2)μV vs(4.5±1.0)μV,(7.5±2.2)μV vs(4.6±1.2)μV,P均〈0.05];治疗后,与中药组相比,西药组P2、N2的潜伏期延迟(P〈0.05),P3的潜伏期与中药组相近(P〉0.05),N2、P3的波幅偏砥(P〈0.05),P2的波幅值与中药组相近(P〉0.05)。(3)与对照组相比,治疗前中药组、西药组P2、N2、P3的潜伏期均显著延迟,波幅都显著降低(P〈0.05);治疗后中药组P2、N2、P3的潜伏期值及P2、N2、P3的波幅值与对照组相近(P〉0.05)。西药组P2、N2的潜伏期显著延迟(P〈0.05),P3的潜伏期值与对照组相近(P〉0.05),P2、N2、P3的波幅显著偏低(P〈0.05)。结论芪参复康胶囊芪、氟西汀治疗可改善首发抑郁症认知功能,而芪参复康胶囊提高患者信息加工的前期准备效率优于西药氟西汀。

关 键 词:抗抑郁药/投药和剂量  胶囊△  氟西汀/药理学  抑郁症/病理生理学  电生理学

Effects of Qishen Fukang capsules and Fluoxetine treatments on event-related potentials in first-episode depressions
YANG Lai-qi , CHEN Jiu , YANG Xi-min , LI Yu , ZHANG Yan , WU Yin-xia , LI Xin-tian.Effects of Qishen Fukang capsules and Fluoxetine treatments on event-related potentials in first-episode depressions[J].Journal of Chinese Physician,2012,14(6):742-745.
Authors:YANG Lai-qi  CHEN Jiu  YANG Xi-min  LI Yu  ZHANG Yan  WU Yin-xia  LI Xin-tian
Institution:. Center for Mental Disease Control and Prevention, Third Hospital of PLA ,Baoji 721004, China
Abstract: Abstract] Objective To compare the effects of Qishen Fukang capsules and Fluoxetine on cogni- tive function in first-episode depressions. Methods Between December 2011 and January 2012, 63 de- pressed patients with first-episode from Center for Mental Disease Control and Prevention of Third Hospital of PLA were enrolled, and were divided randomly into the Qishen Fukang capsules-treated group ( Chinese medicine group, CMG, 31 cases) and fluoxetine treated group (Western medicine group, WMG, 32 cases; Jiangsu changzhou pharmaceutical Co. , LTD production) by the method of the random number table. The therapeutic dose was oral 0.2 - 0.6 g ( three times/d) for each CMG patient, and morning oral 20 ~ 40 (20 ±5) mg/d for each WMG patient. Meanwhile, each patient was given the short -term small doses ofbenzodiazepine drugs, but no other antidepressants. Each patient and control was assessed with 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD). A total of 32 healthy subjects were involved as control group. Each patient was measured with evoked event-related potential P300 change before and after 6 weeks treatment. And compared the effects of Qishen Fukang capsules and Fluoxetine on cognitive function in first-episode depressions before and after treatment. Results (1) Compared with prior-treatment CMG (29. 1 ± 5. 1 ) score vs WMG(29. 0 ± 4. 5)score], the HAMD scores of post-treatment CMG( 10. 1 ± 3.2)score vs WMG (12. 3 ± 3.4) score ] were decreased significhntly ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The HAMD scores in CMG were signifi- candy lower than the WMG( P 〈 0. 05). The HAMD reductive rate in CMG was significantly higher than the WMG (65.6 ±2. 1)% vs (57.9 ±3.2)%, P 〈0. 05]. (2)Compared with prior-treatment, the laten- cy periods of post-treatment were shortened P2 ( 152. 8 ± 54. 1 ) ms vs (208.9 ± 57. 6 ) ms, ( 174. 5 ± 63.2) ms vs (207. 3 ± 55.8 ) ms; N2 ( 208. 7 ± 57. 9 ) ms vs ( 273.4 ± 62. 0) ms, (239. 2 ± 59. 2) ms vs (275.6 ±60. 8)ms; P3(319. 1 ±60. 2)ms vs (396. 3 ±66. 3)ms, (315.6 ±61.1)ms vs (394. 7 ±55.6) ms ], while the amplitudes were prolonged P2 (7. 8 ± 1.7 ) IJ, V vs (3.3 ± 1.2 ) μV, (7. 0 ± 1.4 ) μV vs (3.4 ±1. 4)μV; N2 (3.6±1.4)μV vs (1.0 ±0.7)μV, (2.4 ±1.3)μV vs (1.2 ±1. 0)μV; P3 (9.6 ±2. 2)μVvs (4.5±1.0)μV, (7.5±2.2)μV vs (4.6±1.2)μV] in the CMG and WMG (allP 〈 0.05). Compared with the CMG, the latency periods of P2, and N2 were significantly longer (all P 〈 0. 05), and the latency period of P3 was no difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ), and the amplitudes of N2, and P3 were lower ( all P 〈 0. 05 ), and the amplitude of P2 was no difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ) in the post-treatment of WMG. (3)Compared with the controls, the latency periods of P2, N2, and P3 were shortened, while the amplitudes were prolonged in the post-treatment of CMG and WMG ( all P 〈 0. 05 ). The latency periods and amplitudes of P2, N2, and P3 did not show any difference in the CMG after treatment ( all P 〉 0.05). The latency period of P2, and N2 were still significantly longer ( all P 〈 0.05 ) and the latency period of P3 was no difference ( P 〉 0. 05) while the amplitude of P2, N2, and P3 were still significantly lower ( all P 〈 0. 05) in the post-treatment of WMG. Conclusions Qishen Fukang capsules and Fluoxetine can im- prove significantly cognitive function in first-episode depressions. Qishen Fukang capsules is superior to flu- oxetine on improving the early preparation efficiency of information processing.
Keywords:Antidepressive agents/administration & dosage  Capsules △  Fluoxetine/pharmacology  Depressive disorder/physiopathology  Electrophysiology
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号