Effects of a new cardiomyoplasty technique on cardiac function

OBJECTIVE: The current cardiomyoplasty technique was modified to maintain the resting tension of the latissimus dorsi muscle and to prevent lateral movement of the heart during muscle stimulation. The aim of this study is to compare the short term hemodynamic effects of the new cardiomyoplasty wrap (W1) with those of the clinically applied cardiomyoplasty wrap (W2). Preliminary indications of the long-term hemodynamic effects of W1 are presented. METHODS: In three acute experiments in sheep mean central venous pressure (MCVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean cardiac output (MCOP), mean left ventricular systolic pressure (MLVSP), and mean left ventricular diastolic pressure (MLVDP) were measured for 30s before and five minutes after applying each procedure with and without stimulation of the muscle graft. The same parameters were also recorded 5min after removing each muscle wrap. Hemodynamic changes associated with unstimulated muscle wraps were compared to the baseline data. Hemodynamic effects of muscle stimulation were determined by comparing the assisted to the preceding unassisted cardiac cycle. The long-term effects of W1 on the hemodynamics of another three sheep were studied at 6-12months after the operation. The viability of the muscles used in the chronic experiments were evaluated by morphometric analysis. RESULTS: Unstimulated W2 significantly increased mean central venous pressure and reduced mean cardiac output. It also increased mean left ventricular diastolic pressure and reduced peak negative dP/dt. Unstimulated W1 had no deleterious effect on mean central venous pressure, mean left ventricular diastolic pressure or peak -dP/dt, but it also reduced mean cardiac output and increased mean left atrial pressure (MLAP). Synchronised muscle stimulation, in both techniques, augmented the mean arterial pressure, mean cardiac output and mean left ventricular systolic pressure. In W2, however, myostimulation was also associated with a significant increase of the mean left ventricular diastolic pressure. In two long-term experiments significant hemodynamic assistance was observed at 6months and at 1yr after W1. In those sheep 68% of the cross-sectional area of the muscle was well preserved. CONCLUSIONS: Unstimulated cardiomyoplasty wraps acutely impair left ventricular function in sheep. The new technique, however, may offer significant long-term hemodynamic assistance and adequate preservation of the structural and functional integrity of the muscle flap for up to 1yr.