Increased survival after EMS witnessed cardiac arrest. Observations from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Epistry—Cardiac arrest |
| |
Authors: | David Hostler Elizabeth G. Thomas James Christenson Jon C. Rittenberger Blair L. Bigham Gary M. Vilke Sheldon Cheskes Daniel P. Davis Ahamed Idris The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators |
| |
Affiliation: | a University of Pittsburgh, Department of Emergency Medicine, 3600 Forbes Avenue, Suite 400A, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States b University of Washington Clinical Trial Center, Seattle, WA, United States c University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada d University of Ottawa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa, ON, Canada e Clackamas County Fire District, Milwaukie, OR, United States f University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada g University of California, San Diego, CA, United States h Sunnybrook-Osler Centre for Prehospital Care, Etobicoke, ON, Canada i Toronto Emergency Medical Services, Toronto, ON, Canada j Queens University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kingston, ON, Canada k University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States l University of Washington-Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, Seattle, WA, United States |
| |
Abstract: |
BackgroundOut of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is common and lethal. It has been suggested that OHCA witnessed by EMS providers is a predictor of survival because advanced help is immediately available. We examined EMS witnessed OHCA from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) to determine the effect of EMS witnessed vs. bystander witnessed and unwitnessed OHCA.MethodsData were analyzed from a prospective, population-based cohort study in 10 U.S. and Canadian ROC sites. Individuals with non-traumatic OHCA treated 04/01/06-03/31/07 by EMS providers with defibrillation or chest compressions were included. Cases were grouped into EMS-witnessed, bystander witnessed, and unwitnessed and further stratified for bystander CPR. Multiple logistic regressions evaluated the odds ratio (OR) for survival to discharge relative to the EMS-witnessed group after adjusting for age, sex, public/private location of collapse, ROC site, and initial ECG rhythm. Of 9991 OHCA, 1022 (10.2%) of EMS-witnessed, 3369 (33.7%) bystander witnessed, and 5600 (56.1%) unwitnessed.ResultsThe most common initial rhythm in the EMS-witnessed group was PEA which was higher than in the bystander- and unwitnessed groups (p < 0.001). The adjusted OR (95% CI) of survival compared to the EMS-witnessed group was 0.41, (0.36, 0.46) in bystander witnessed with bystander CPR, 0.37 (0.33, 0.43) in bystander witnessed without bystander CPR, 0.17 (0.14, 0.20) in unwitnessed with bystander CPR and 0.21 (0.18, 0.24) in unwitnessed cases without bystander CPR.ConclusionsImmediate application of prehospital care for OHCA may improve survival. Efforts should be made to educate patients to access 9-1-1 for prodromal symptoms. |
| |
Keywords: | Prehospital CPR Bystander Return of spontaneous circulation ROSC |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|