|
|||||
|
|
Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial |
|
| Authors: | Strasser Dale C Falconer Judith A Stevens Alan B Uomoto Jay M Herrin Jeph Bowen Susan E Burridge Andrea B |
| Affiliation: | a Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, and Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, GA b Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL c Scott & White Memorial Hospital, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, Temple, TX d Center for Polytrauma Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System (Seattle Division), Seattle, WA e Yale University, New Haven, CT f Flying Buttress Associates, Charlottesville, VA g TREP - HSR&D, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA h Department of Educational Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX. |
| Abstract: | Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Stevens AB, Uomoto JM, Herrin J, Bowen SE, Burridge AB. Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial. ObjectiveTo test whether a team training intervention in stroke rehabilitation is associated with improved patient outcomes.DesignA cluster randomized trial of 31 rehabilitation units comparing stroke outcomes between intervention and control groups.SettingThirty-one Veterans Affairs medical centers.ParticipantsA total of 237 clinical staff on 16 control teams and 227 staff on 15 intervention teams. Stroke patients (N=487) treated by these teams before and after the intervention.InterventionThe intervention consisted of a multiphase, staff training program delivered over 6 months, including: an off-site workshop emphasizing team dynamics, problem solving, and the use of performance feedback data; and action plans for process improvement; and telephone and videoconference consultations. Control and intervention teams received site-specific team performance profiles with recommendations to use this information to modify team process.Main Outcome MeasuresThree patient outcomes: functional improvement as measured by the change in motor items of the FIM instrument, community discharge, and length of stay (LOS).ResultsFor both the primary (stroke only) and secondary analyses (all patients), there was a significant difference in improvement of functional outcome between the 2 groups, with the percentage of stroke patients gaining more than a median FIM gain of 23 points increasing significantly more in the intervention group (difference in increase, 13.6%; P=.032). There was no significant difference in LOS or rates of community discharge.ConclusionsStroke patients treated by staff who participated in a team training program were more likely to make functional gains than those treated by staff receiving information only. Team based clinicians are encouraged to examine their own team. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00237757). |
| Keywords: | Clinical trial Patient care teams Rehabilitation Stroke Training of trainers Treatment outcome |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录！ | |