首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Reproducibility of two different methods for performing mean gray value evaluation of cyst content in endometriomas using VOCAL
Authors:Stefano Guerriero  Juan Luis Alcazar  Monica Pilloni  Silvia Ajossa  Begoña Olartecoechea  Federica Sedda  Alba Piras  Gian Benedetto Melis  Luca Saba
Institution:1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale 46, 09124, Cagliari, Italy
2. Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
3. AOU of Cagliari, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
Abstract:

Objective

To compare two different methods (manual sampling of the entire cyst and semi-automated spherical sampling from the central part of the cyst) for calculating the mean gray value (MGV) from the cystic content in endometriomas using virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL).

Methods

Forty-one volumes from histologically confirmed endometriomas were retrieved from our database and the volumes were analyzed to compare the MGVs obtained via the two modalities. In addition, to evaluate the reproducibility in a sample of 20 volumes, two different observers calculated the MGV from cyst content using VOCAL software. For each method, each examiner analyzed the volumes twice, 3 weeks apart, for assessment of intra-observer agreement. First, manual sampling of the internal contour of all the cysts was performed, and 1 week later semi-automated 2-cm sphere sampling from the central part of the cyst was carried out. In addition, the observers recorded the time spent performing each analysis. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was evaluated for each method using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results

There was no difference in the mean MGV between manual sampling (22.211 ± 7.541) and the semi-automated modality of sampling (23.840 ± 8.621, p = 0.439). The correlation between manual and semi-automated sampling measurement was high (r = 0.92). According to the ICCs, there was no significant difference in interobserver reliability between manual sampling (0.931; 95 % CI, 0.824–0.973) and the semi-automated modality of sampling (0.924; 95 % CI, 0.809–0.970). Intra-observer reproducibility for both examiners was good (ICC > 0.94). Semi-automated measurements were obtained faster than those obtained by manual evaluation (p = 0.0001 for observer 1 and p = 0.083 for observer 2).

Conclusions

Both methods seem to be reliable, but the semi-automated method using the sphere should be preferred because it is a less time-consuming procedure.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号