首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

双源CT冠状动脉成像中前瞻性与回顾性心电触发模式的比较
引用本文:李烁,王怡宁,孔令燕,王志伟,周慷,樊红苓,王明,金征宇. 双源CT冠状动脉成像中前瞻性与回顾性心电触发模式的比较[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2012, 3(2): 208-212. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2012.02.017
作者姓名:李烁  王怡宁  孔令燕  王志伟  周慷  樊红苓  王明  金征宇
作者单位:中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院放射科, 北京 100730
摘    要:  目的  比较前瞻性心电触发序列扫描与回顾性心电触发螺旋扫描模式在双源CT冠状动脉成像中的图像质量及放射线剂量。  方法  将70例临床怀疑或已知冠心病的患者随机分为两组, 每组35例, 分别行前瞻性心电触发序列扫描和回顾性心电触发螺旋扫描冠状动脉CT成像, 对两种成像模式的图像质量及放射线剂量进行评价。  结果  两组患者的性别、年龄、体重指数匹配性良好, 差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。前瞻性心电触发序列扫描模式组和回顾性心电触发螺旋扫描模式组可评价的冠状动脉节段显示率分别为99.62%和99.62%, 两组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.000, P=1.000);两组图像质量评分分别为1.13±0.36和1.04±0.24, 差异有统计学意义(Z=-5.073, P=0.000);前瞻性心电触发序列扫描模式的放射线剂量为(3.47±1.00)mSv, 明显低于回顾性螺旋扫描模式的(14.28±1.81)mSv(P=0.032)。  结论  对于心律齐且心率≤ 70次/min的患者, 尽管前瞻性心电触发序列扫描的图像质量略差于回顾性螺旋扫描模式, 但两者可评价的冠状动脉节段显示率无明显差异, 而前者的有效放射剂量明显减少。

关 键 词:冠状动脉成像   X线计算机体层摄影术   影像质量   放射剂量
收稿时间:2011-06-15

Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Electrocardiogram-triggered Coronary CT Angiography Using Dual-source CT
LI Shuo,WANG Yi-ning,KONG Ling-yan,WANG Zhi-wei,ZHOU Kang, FAN Hong-ling,WANG Ming,JIN Zheng-yu. Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Electrocardiogram-triggered Coronary CT Angiography Using Dual-source CT[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospit, 2012, 3(2): 208-212. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2012.02.017
Authors:LI Shuo  WANG Yi-ning  KONG Ling-yan  WANG Zhi-wei  ZHOU Kang   FAN Hong-ling  WANG Ming  JIN Zheng-yu
Affiliation:Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the image quality and radiation exposure of prospective electrocardio- gram ( ECG) -triggered sequential and retrospective spiral acquisition coronary CT angiography by dual-source CT. Methods Seventy patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease were randomly divided into two groups ( n = 35 ) . Group A underwent prospective ECG-triggered sequential scan and group B underwent retrospective ECG-triggered spiral scan. The image quality and radiation exposure of both modes were evalua- ted. Results There was no significant difference in gender,age,or body mass index between the two groups ( P > 0. 05) . The rates of diagnostic coronary segments for group A and group B were 99. 62% and 99. 62% , respectively ( χ 2 = 0. 000,P = 1. 000 ) . The average image quality score was 1. 13 ± 0. 36 in group A and 1. 04 ± 0. 24 in group B,with significant difference between the two groups ( Z = - 5. 073,P = 0. 000) . The mean radiation dose of group A was significantly lower than that of group B [( 3. 47 ± 1. 00) mSv vs. ( 14. 28 ±1. 81) mSv,P = 0. 032]. Conclusion The prospective ECG-triggered sequential scan coronary CT angiogra- phy technique significantly reduces radiation dose without impairing the rates of diagnostic coronary segments when compared with the retrospective ECG-triggered spiral data acquisition in patients with a low and stable heart rate ( ≤70 bpm) . 【
Keywords:coronary angiography  X-ray computed tomography  image quality  radiation exposure
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《协和医学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《协和医学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号