首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

乳腺粘液癌超声特征及免疫组化指标
作者姓名:桑田  康燕飞  曹玉文  葛肖艳  吴芳  童瑾  王甲嘉  董建  李军
作者单位:1.石河子大学医学院第一附属医院超声科,新疆 石河子 8320082.国家卫健委中亚高发病防治重点实验室,新疆 石河子 8320083.石河子大学医学院病理教研室,新疆 石河子 832008
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(82060318;81860498;81560433);中国医学科学院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(2020-PT330-003);兵团科技攻关项目(2019DB012)
摘    要:  目的  分析乳腺粘液癌的超声图像特征及免疫组化指标,提高诊断粘液癌的准确性。  方法  回顾性分析56例乳腺癌肿块的超声特征(肿块最大径、纵横比、高回声晕、转移情况、弹性评分等)、剪切波速度(SWVmax、SWVratio、SWVmean)及免疫组化检测结果(雌激素受体、孕激素受体、人表皮生长因子受体2、Ki-67),将粘液癌患者作为实验组(n=24),将浸润性导管癌患者作为对照组(n=32),对比两组超声特征及免疫组化指标表达的差异性,并对超声特征及免疫组化指标进行相关性分析。  结果  与浸润性导管癌相比,粘液癌肿块多表现为边界清晰、有高回声晕、后方回声增强、弹性评分 < 4分且BI-RADS分类 < 4b类(χ2=4.419、5.171、6.162、4.743、14.000,P < 0.05),SWVmax及雌激素受体、人表皮生长因子受体2的阳性率在两组中的差异具有统计学意义(t=- 2.069,χ2=4.371、4.051,P < 0.05)。  结论  乳腺粘液癌超声特征及免疫组化指标的表达与浸润性导管癌相比具有一定的差异,可为超声诊断乳腺癌类型及治疗方案的选择提供参考。 

关 键 词:乳腺粘液癌    乳腺浸润性导管癌    超声检查    弹性成像    免疫组化
收稿时间:2021-07-26

Ultrasonographic features and immunohistochemical parameters of mucinous Carcinoma of breast
Authors:SANG Tian  KANG Yanfei  CAO Yuwen  GE Xiaoyan  WU Fang  TONG Jin  WANG Jiajia  DONG Jian  LI Jun
Institution:1.Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi 832008, China2.NHC Key Laboratory of Prevention and Treatment of Central Asia High Incidence Diseases, Shihezi 832008, China3.Department of Pathology, the School of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832008, China
Abstract:  Objective  To analyze the ultrasonographic features and immunohistochemical indexes of mucinous carcinoma of the breast, and improve the accuracy in the diagnosis of mucinous carcinoma.  Methods  The ultrasonographic features (maximum diameter, aspect ratio, high echo halo, metastasis, elastic score), shear wave velocity (SWVmax, SWVratio, SWVmean) and immunohistochemical detection (ER, PR, HER-2, Ki-67) of 56 cases were analyzed retrospectively. 24 cases with mucinous carcinoma were used as experimental group and 32 cases with invasive ductal carcinoma were used as control group.The differences of ultrasonic features and immunohistochemical indexes between the two groups were compared. The correlation between ultrasonic features and immunohistochemical indexes was analyzed.  Results  Compared with invasive ductal carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma showed clear boundary, high echo halo, posterior echo enhancement, less than 4 score and BI-RADS classification < 4b (χ2=4.419, 5.171, 6.162, 4.743, 14.000, P < 0.05). The positive rates of SWVmax, ER and HER-2 were significantly different between the two groups (t=-2.069, χ2=4.371, 4.051, P < 0.05).  Conclusion  Compared with invasive ductal carcinoma, the expression of ultrasound features and immunohistochemical markers in mucinous carcinoma of breast are different, which can provide reference for the diagnosis and treatment of mucinous Carcinoma of breast. 
Keywords:
点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号