首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

MCu110和TCu220C、TCu380A宫内节育器比较的系统评估
引用本文:张磊,何杨,毛燕燕,车焱,周维谨. MCu110和TCu220C、TCu380A宫内节育器比较的系统评估[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2009, 17(5): 262-266
作者姓名:张磊  何杨  毛燕燕  车焱  周维谨
作者单位:1. 上海市计划生育科学研究所,200032
2. 重庆市计划生育科学研究院
摘    要:
目的:评价MCu110功能性宫内节育器的有效性、副反应和可接受性。方法:通过电子和手工检索查阅2000年1月~2008年12月国内外发表的相关文献,并依照循证医学的方法对纳入评估的文献进行筛选、评价和分析。结果:共获得合格文献10篇,均为随机对照临床试验且正式发表。评估结果显示,置器后12月和24月,MCu110的临床综合效果优于TCu220C;脱落率略低于TCu380A,可接受性略优于TCu380A,副反应各项指标二者互有优劣,而带器妊娠率差别未发现有统计学意义。结论:与TCu380A相比,能够证实MCu110有效性、副反应和可接受性的多中心随机对照试验并不多,尤其是长期随访研究;建议由非MCu110研制单位组织开展多中心随机对照试验,观察年限不少于5年。

关 键 词:宫内节育器  MCu110  TCu380A  TCu220C  Meta分析

Systematic Review of the Comparison between MCu110 and TCu220C as well as TCu380A
Zhang Lei,He Yang,Mao Yanyan,et al.. Systematic Review of the Comparison between MCu110 and TCu220C as well as TCu380A[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2009, 17(5): 262-266
Authors:Zhang Lei  He Yang  Mao Yanyan  et al.
Affiliation:Zhang Lei,He Yang,Mao Yanyan,et al.Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research,Shanghai 200032
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the effectivity,side effects,and acceptability of functional intrauterine device(IUD) MCu110.Methods: Relevant literatures published at home and abroad during January 2000 and October 2008 were searched through electronic and manual inspection.And the included literatures were screened,evaluated and analyzed according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine.Results: 10 qualified papers were obtained,all of which were randomized controlled clinical trials(RCTs) and published formall...
Keywords:MCu110  TCu380A  TCu220C
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号