Evaluation of models that predict short-term outcome after traumatic brain injury

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify models that predicted the short-term outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) from the literature and to evaluate their clinical significance. METHODS: Literatures from PubMED were reviewed. Regression coefficients and intercepts were extracted. A group of 229 cases was used for validation and the unfavourable rate was calculated to assess the validity of these models by the area under receiver operating. Characteristic curve (AUC), C-statistic and Brier score. MAIN RESULTS: In total, 13 studies of 18 different models were included. Data from the validation group were in accordance with the indicators of the studies reviewed. All models got an AUC value ranging from 0.644-0.890 except two (AUC value <0.6) and their Brier scores were near zero. However, the calibration of most studies was insufficient (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the models included in this study have a good discriminatory power while lacking sufficient calibration. However, they all predict with relative accuracy at the level of individuals. Therefore, current models can be used to predict the survival rate of individual patients and may be useful to inform patients and relatives about the likelihood of a beneficial outcome.