首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

超声造影联合超声弹性成像在肝脏良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用价值
引用本文:周成香,刘亚斌,朱小虎,游岚岚,苟博. 超声造影联合超声弹性成像在肝脏良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2017, 0(6): 939-942. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2017.06.020
作者姓名:周成香  刘亚斌  朱小虎  游岚岚  苟博
作者单位:610500,成都医学院第一附属医院
摘    要:
目的 探讨超声造影联合超声弹性成像在肝脏良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用价值.方法 收取肝脏良恶性肿瘤患者88例作为研究对象进行回顾性分析,对其术前超声造影及超声弹性成像检查结果进行观察与对比,并评估2种方法单独或联合诊断的效能.结果 超声造影诊断符合率为86.46% (83/96),超声弹性成像诊断符合率为91.67% (88/96),超声造影联合弹性成像诊断符合率为94.79% (91/96).超声造影联合弹性成像诊断效能高于单独诊断,但三者间差异均不具有统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 超声造影联合超声弹性成像可提高肝脏肿瘤诊断准确率,对于良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断具有较高的应用价值.

关 键 词:肝脏良恶性肿瘤  鉴别诊断  超声造影  超声弹性成像

Application Value of Ultrasound Contrast Combined with Ultrasound Elastography in Differential Diagnoses of Benign and Malignant Liver Tumor
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application value of ultrasound contrast combined with ultrasound elastography in differential diagnoses of benign and malignant liver tumor.Methods 88 patients with benign and malignant liver tumor were retrospectively analyzed.The results of ultrasound contrast and ultrasound elastography were compared in order to evaluate the diagnosis efficiency of single or combined detection of the 2 methods.Results The diagnostic coincidence rate of ultrasound contrast was 86.46% (83/96),of ultrasound elastography was 91.67% (88/96).The diagnostic coincidence rate of combined detection was 94.79% (91/96),which were higher than single detection without statistical difference (P > 0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound contrast combined with ultrasound elastography can improve the accuracy rate of detection,which has a good clinical value in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant liver tumor.
Keywords:Benign and malignant liver tumor  Differential diagnosis  Ultrasound contrast  Ultrasound elastography
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号