Intraoperative radiotherapy in colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques,long-term outcomes,and complications |
| |
Authors: | Reza Mirnezami George J. Chang Prajnan Das Kandiah Chandrakumaran Paris Tekkis Ara Darzi Alexander H. Mirnezami |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Section of Biosurgery & Surgical Technology, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, 10th Floor QEQM Building, St Mary''s Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK;2. Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA;3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA;4. Department of Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire RG249NA, UK;5. Somers Cancer Research Building, University of Southampton Cancer Sciences Division, Southampton University Hospital NHS Trust, Tremona road, Southampton SO166YD, UK |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundThe precise contribution of IORT to the management of locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the value of IORT in this setting.MethodsStudies published between 1965 and 2011 that reported outcomes after IORT for advanced or recurrent CRC were identified by an electronic literature search. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and design, and evaluated for technique of IORT delivery, oncological outcomes, and complications following IORT. Outcomes were analysed with fixed-effect and random-effect model meta-analyses and heterogeneity and publication bias examined.Results29 studies comprising 14 prospective and 15 retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed, yielding a total of 3003 patients. The indication for IORT was locally advanced disease in 1792 patients and locally recurrent disease in 1211 patients. Despite heterogeneity in methodology and reporting practice, IORT is principally applied for the treatment of close or positive margins. When comparative studies were evaluated, a significant effect favouring improved local control (OR 0.22; 95% CI = 0.05–0.86; p = 0.03), disease free survival (HR 0.51; 95% CI = 0.31–0.85; p = 0.009), and overall survival (HR 0.33; 95% CI = 0.2–0.54; p = 0.001) was noted with no increase in total (OR 1.13; 95% CI = 0.77–1.65; p = 0.57), urologic (OR 1.35; 95% CI = 0.84–2.82; p = 0.47), or anastomotic complications (OR 0.94; 95% CI = 0.42–2.1; p = 0.98). Increased wound complications were noted after IORT (OR 1.86; 95% CI = 1.03–3.38; p = 0.049).ConclusionsDespite methodological weaknesses in the studies evaluated, our results suggest that IORT may improve oncological outcomes in advanced and recurrent CRC. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|