首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

良性阵发性位置性眩晕与前庭性偏头痛患者焦虑抑郁状态比较研究
引用本文:申园,朱翠婷,李一青,鞠奕.良性阵发性位置性眩晕与前庭性偏头痛患者焦虑抑郁状态比较研究[J].中国卒中杂志,2019,14(8):756-759.
作者姓名:申园  朱翠婷  李一青  鞠奕
作者单位:100070 北京首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经病学中心血管神经病学科;国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心;北京脑重大疾病研究院脑卒中研究所
基金项目:基于HINTS检查的眼动评估系统快速诊断后循环缺血的应用价值及优化研究2-949-03(首发2016-2-2042-DR)
摘    要:目的 比较良性阵发性位置性眩晕(benign paroxysmal positional vertigo,BPPV)患者和前庭性偏头痛 (vestibular migraine,VM)患者焦虑、抑郁的发生率和特点。 方法 收集2016年9月-2017年9月诊断为BPPV和VM患者各50例。对两组患者进行眩晕残障量表 (dizziness handicap inventory,DHI)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(hospital anxiety and depression scale,HADS)评 定,比较两组基线资料和DHI 、HADS评分的差异。 结果 治疗前BPPV组存在明显眩晕残障者32例(64%),存在焦虑抑郁者15例(30%),治疗后分 别为3例(6%)和2例(4%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001和P =0.001);治疗前VM组存在明显眩晕 残障者38例(76%),存在焦虑抑郁者为28例(56%),治疗后分别为12例(24%)和8例(16%),差异 均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。治疗前VM组DHI55.00(44.00~70.00)vs 31.00(20.00~45.00),P <0.001]和HADS评分13.50(6.00~20.00)vs 6.00(3.75~10.00),P =0.001]高于BPPV组,其中DHI评 分中情感、躯体和功能3个分项的评分也均高于BPPV组,差异均有统计学意义。治疗后VM组DHI22.00 (12.00~34.00)vs 0(0~4.00),P<0.001]和HADS评分7.50(2.00~10.50)vs 0(0~3.00),P<0.001] 仍高于BPPV组,其中DHI评分中情感、躯体和功能3个分项的评分也均高于BPPV组,差异均有统计学 意义。 结论 VM患者焦虑抑郁严重程度高于BPPV患者,两组经治疗后焦虑抑郁的发生率均有显著下降。

关 键 词:眩晕残障量表  医院焦虑抑郁量表  前庭性偏头痛  良性阵发性位置性眩晕  
收稿时间:2018-12-28

Comparison of Anxiety and Depression between Patients with Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo and Vestibular Migraine
SHEN Yuan,ZHU Cui-Ting,LI Yi-Qing,JU Yi.Comparison of Anxiety and Depression between Patients with Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo and Vestibular Migraine[J].Chinese Journal of Stroke,2019,14(8):756-759.
Authors:SHEN Yuan  ZHU Cui-Ting  LI Yi-Qing  JU Yi
Abstract:Objective To compare the incidence and charateristics of anxiety and depression between the
patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and vestibular migraine (VM).
Methods 100 outpatients diagnosed with BPPV (n =50) and VM (n =50) at Beijing Tian Tan
Hospital from September 2016 to December 2017 were included in the analysis. Dizziness handicap
inventory (DHI) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) were used to evaluate the
emotional state of the two groups.
Results In BPPV group: the incidence of significant dizziness handicap, depression and anxiety
were 64% (32/50) and 30% (15/50) before treatment respectively, and reduced to 6% (3/50) and
4% (2/50) after treatment respectively, and the differences before and after treatment had statistical
significance (P <0.001 and P =0.001, respectively). In VM group: the incidence of significant
dizziness handicap, depression and anxiety were 76% (38/50) and 56% (28/50) before treatment
respectively, and reduced to 24% (12/50) and 16% (8/50) respectively, and the differences before
and after treatment had statistical significance (P <0.001 and P <0.001, respectively). Beforetreatment, the DHI 55.00 (44.00-70.00) vs 31.00 (20.00-45.00), P <0.001] and HADS scores 13.50
(6.00-20.00) vs 6.00 (3.75-10.00), P =0.001] were both higher in VM group than that in BPPV
group and what’s more, the scores in functional, emotional and physical items were all significantly
higher in VM group than that in BPPV group. After treatment, the scores of DHI 22.00 (12.00-34.00)
vs 0 (0-4.00), P <0.001] and HADS scores 7.50 (2.00-10.50) vs 0 (0-3.00), P <0.001] in VM group
were still higher than that in BPPV group, and similarly, the scores in functional, emotional and
physical items were all higher in VM group than that in BPPV group, and the above differences all
had statistical significance.
Conclusions The incidence and severity of anxiety and depression were both higher in VM
patients than that in BPPV patients, and the incidence greatly declined in VM and BPPV patients
after treatment.
Keywords:Dizziness Handicap Inventory  Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale  Vestibular migraine  Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国卒中杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国卒中杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号