首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

临界正畸患者不同处理措施对牙硬组织变化的研究
引用本文:林嘉旭. 临界正畸患者不同处理措施对牙硬组织变化的研究[J]. 中国医药导刊, 2011, 13(1): 52-53
作者姓名:林嘉旭
作者单位:汕头市中心医院口腔科,汕头,515041
摘    要:目的:探讨临界正畸患者不同处理措施对牙硬组织的影响,旨在提高患者的生活质量,采取最佳的治疗措施。方法:将2008年1月-2009年6月在我院牙科进行诊治的临界正畸患者28例,根据不同的处理措施分为两组,拔牙组与非拔牙组。随访并比较两种处理措施的临床疗效。结果:两组在牙齿排列、覆颌覆盖、中线、侧方咬合及总分间的差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05);而拔牙组的侧貌远高于对照组,且差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。拔牙组与未拔牙组在患者满意度间的差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:对临界正畸患者采取不同的处理措施对牙硬组织具有不同的疗效,在实际临床工作中,应根据实际情况采取不同的治疗措施。

关 键 词:临界正畸  牙硬组织  拔牙  治疗

The Influence of Different Treatments on Dental Hard Tissue in Critical Orthodontic Patients
Lin Jia-xu. The Influence of Different Treatments on Dental Hard Tissue in Critical Orthodontic Patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide, 2011, 13(1): 52-53
Authors:Lin Jia-xu
Affiliation:Lin Jia-xu (dentistry department of central hospital in Shantou,Shantou 515041,China)
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the influence of different treatments on dental hard tissue in critical orthodontic patients,aimed at improving the quality of patients’ life and take the best treatment.Methods:28 critical orthodontic patients were treated in our hospital from January 2008 to June 2009.All patients were divided into two groups,extraction group and the non-extraction group,according to the different treatment measures.Follow-up and compare the clinical efficacy of two treatments.Results:The teeth arrangement,covered jaw coverage,midline,lateral and total occlusion showed no significant difference between two groups(p>0.05);the profile of extraction group is higher,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).The patients’ satisfaction in two groups have no significant difference(p>0.05). Conclusion:There are different efficacy of treatment measures to dental hard tissues.In clinical work,different therapeutic measures should be taken based on the actual situation.
Keywords:Critical orthodontic  Dental hard tissue  Extraction  Treatment
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号