首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术与开腹手术围手术期疗效分析
引用本文:李俊韬,洪楚原,邹湘才,邓一文,梁国健,林健生,张继民. 腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术与开腹手术围手术期疗效分析[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2011, 38(10): 666-671. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4203.2011.10.007
作者姓名:李俊韬  洪楚原  邹湘才  邓一文  梁国健  林健生  张继民
作者单位:广州医学院第二附属医院胃肠外科, 广州,510260
摘    要:目的 比较腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术与传统开腹手术围手术期的疗效与安全性,评价腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术的可行性、安全性和肿瘤根治性.方法 收集整理广州医学院第二附属医院胃肠外科开展腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术的44例临床资料,包括手术相关指标、术后恢复指标、肿瘤根治性指标、术中术后并发症等数据,进行统计学分析,并与同期53例传统开腹手术...

关 键 词:直肠癌  腹腔镜  开腹手术  围手术期

Perioperative efficacy on radical resection of rectal carcinoma: a comparafive analysis of laparoscopy with open approach
LI Jun-tao,HONG Chu-yuan,ZOU Xiang-cai,DENG Yi-wen,LIANG Guo-jian,LIN Jian-sheng,ZHANG Ji-min. Perioperative efficacy on radical resection of rectal carcinoma: a comparafive analysis of laparoscopy with open approach[J]. International Journal of Surgery, 2011, 38(10): 666-671. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4203.2011.10.007
Authors:LI Jun-tao  HONG Chu-yuan  ZOU Xiang-cai  DENG Yi-wen  LIANG Guo-jian  LIN Jian-sheng  ZHANG Ji-min
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy of the radical resection by laparoscopy versus open approach in perioperative period on the patients with rectal carcinoma,and investigate the feasibility,safety and oncological clearance of the laparoscopy.Methods The clinical data of 44 patients who underwent radical resection of rectal carcinoma by laparoscopy in our hospital were reviewed and compared with another 53patients who underwent an open approach in the same period.The surgery-related data,postoperative recovery status,tumor radical resection index,and postoperative complications by laparoscopy were analyzed by statistics,and compared with those by open approach,and evaluated the deference of too kinds of operation.Results This study showed a longer surgical time (260.45 ± 67.46) min vs ( 179.25 ± 40.92) min,P <0.05,a less intra-operative blood loss( 125.20 ±61.80) mL vs ( 198.02 ± 131.24) mL,P <0.05,in laparoscopic group compared with open approach.Meanwhile,it also showed an earlier recovery of bowel functions for discharge gas from anus,taking in food,and out-of-bed activity (4.34 ± 1.55) d vs(5.45 ± 1.55) d,P <0.05,in the laparoscopic group compared with open approach.There was no statistical difference of incidence of post-operative complications (5 cases vs 11 cases,P >0.05) between the two groups and the laparoscopic approach was also equal to the open approach as regard to post-operative stay (15.34 ±6.62) d vs (16.82±5.73) d,P >0.05,and demand of intra-operative blood transfusion (4 case vs 8 cases,P>0.05 ).Conclusions Compared with open surgery,the radical resection of rectal carcinoma by laparoscopy has shown obvious advantages in smaller incision,less blood loss,less pain,earlier recovery of bowel and bladder functions,and earlier out-of-bed activity.And it is also possible by laparoscopy approach to decrease the post-operative complications and post-operative stay.Meanwhile,there is no significant deference on oncological clearance for laparoscopy compared with open approach during perioperative period,while the long term follow-up data is still needed to support the results.
Keywords:Laparoscopy  Open approach operation  Peri-operative period
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号