首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The development,validity, and reliability of the auditory vocal hallucination rating scale questionnaire (AVHRS-Q)
Authors:Steenhuis  Laura A.  Pijnenborg  Gerdina H. M.  Visser  Ellen  van de Willige  Gerard  van Beilen  Marije  Nauta  Maaike H.  Aleman  André  Bartels-Velthuis  Agna A.
Affiliation:1.Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, The Netherlands
;2.Department of Psychotic Disorders, GGZ-Drenthe, Dennenweg 9, 9404 LA, Assen, The Netherlands
;3.University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research center, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1 (CC72), 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
;4.University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, Psychosis Department, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
;5.Department of Neuroscience, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands
;
Abstract:
Purpose

The Auditory Vocal Hallucination Rating Scale Questionnaire (AVHRS-Q) is a short self-report measure assessing several characteristics of auditory vocal hallucinations (AVH) that was derived from a validated clinical interview (the auditory vocal hallucination rating scale; AVHRS). This study investigated the internal reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity of the AVHRS-Q using two clinical samples.

Methods

In sample I, 32 psychiatric patients with AVH were recruited from an academic hospital service and assessed with the AVHRS and the AVHRS-Q. Data for sample II were retrospectively retrieved from a pseudonymised Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) database collected in the context of mental healthcare at the same academic hospital service. Data from 82 psychiatric patients with AVH were retrieved, who completed the AVHRS-Q, and measures of psychological distress (the Outcome Questionnaire; OQ-45, and the Symptom Checklist; SCL-90) and quality of life (the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life; MANSA).

Results

The AVHRS-Q showed good internal consistency in both samples. Severity scores of the AVHRS-Q were strongly correlated to the severity scores of the AVHRS (r = 0.90, p < 0.01). The AVHRS-Q and AVHRS did not differ in the identification of mild and severe voice-hearers [X2 (1, N = 32) = 15.71]. AVHRS-Q severity scores had moderate correlations with measures of psychological distress (OQ-45, r = 0.43, p < 0.01; SCL-90, r = 0.50, p < 0.05) and quality of life (MANSA, r = − 0.22, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

The AVHRS-Q demonstrated good reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity, suggesting it can be applied in both clinical and research settings for a quick and reliable assessment of AVH.

Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号