首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Genetic engineering in agriculture and corporate engineering in public debate: risk, public relations, and public debate over genetically modified crops
Authors:Patel Rajeev  Torres Robert J  Rosset Peter
Institution:Center for Civil Society, School of Development Studies, University of Kwa-Zulu-Natal, South Africa. raj@voiceoftheturtle.org
Abstract:Corporations have long influenced environmental and occupational health in agriculture, doing a great deal of damage, making substantial profits, and shaping public debate to make it appear that environmental misfortunes are accidents of an otherwise well-functioning system, rather than systemic. The debate over the genetically modified (GM) crops is an example. The largest producer of commercial GM seeds, Monsanto, exemplifies the industry's strategies: the invocation of poor people as beneficiaries, characterization of opposition as technophobic or anti-progress, and portrayal of their products as environmentally beneficial in the absence of or despite the evidence. This strategy is endemic to contemporary market capitalism, with its incentives to companies to externalize health and environmental costs to increase profits.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号