不同DR探测器技术临床应用价值的分析与探讨

目的探讨不同DR探测器技术的临床应用价值,为探测器技术的临床应用和设备综合评价提供科学依据。方法依据前期文献调查法、专家咨询法和百分权重法建立的临床应用价值评价体系,邀请专家对4种不同DR探测器技术进行多维度评价和综合评价。结果不同探测器技术临床应用价值差异较大,非晶硒平板探测器技术和非晶硅平板探测器技术综合评分分别为3.76和4.21,而多丝正比线扫描探测器技术综合评分为2.72。结论不同DR探测器技术性能差距较大,主要表现在图像质量指标上;平板探测器的临床应用价值优于传统的多丝正比线扫描技术和CCD探测器技术。在DR的选型配置中应依据主要临床应用选择合适的探测器,为DR技术的合理应用和设备的规划配置提供参考。

Analysis and Discussion on Clinical Application Value of Different DR Detector Techniques

Objective To explore the clinical application value of different DR detector technology,and provide scientific basis for clinical application and comprehensive evaluation of equipment.Methods According to the clinical application value evaluation system established by literature survey,expert consultation,and percentage weight method,experts were invited to conduct multi-dimensional evaluation and comprehensive evaluation of four different DR detector technologies.Results The clinical application value of different detectors was quite different.The comprehensive scores of amorphous selenium flat panel detector technology and amorphous silicon flat panel detector technology were 3.76 and 4.21,respectively,while the comprehensive score of multi-wire proportional line scanning detector was 2.72.Conclusion The performance of different DR detectors is different,mainly in the image quality indicators.The clinical application value of flat panel detector is superior to traditional multi-wire proportional line scanning technology and CCD detector technology.In the selection and configuration of DR,the appropriate detector should be selected according to the main clinical application,which provides reference for the reasonable application of DR technol ogy and the planning and configuration of the equipment.