Influence of coping and veneer thickness on the color of zirconia-based restorations on different implant abutment backgrounds |
| |
Authors: | Farhad Tabatabaian Alireza Jafari Mahshid Namdari Minoo Mahshid |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;2. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran;3. Assistant Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;4. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran |
| |
Abstract: |
Statement of problemThe effects of coping and veneer thickness on the color of zirconia-based restorations are unknown.PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of coping and veneer thickness on the color of zirconia-based restorations on different implant abutment backgrounds and to define minimum coping and veneer thicknesses for the backgrounds investigated to achieve a target color.Material and methodsThirty zirconia disk specimens with thicknesses of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mm and 30 veneering ceramic disk specimens with thicknesses of 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mm were fabricated. Three backgrounds were prepared: titanium alloy, zirconia ceramic, and base metal alloy. The zirconia specimens were placed on the backgrounds, and the veneering ceramic specimens were located on the zirconia specimens. Spectrophotometric measurements were made to determine CIELab values. Color difference (ΔE) values were calculated to measure color differences between the specimens and the A2 VITA classical shade tab. ΔE values were compared with a perceptibility threshold (ΔE=2.6). Repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni test, and 1-sample t test were used to analyze data (α=.05).ResultsMean ΔE values ranged from 2.0 to 9.8. Coping thickness, veneer thickness, and their combination significantly affected ΔE (P<.001).ConclusionsTo achieve the target color with zirconia-based restorations, regardless of the backgrounds tested, the minimum thickness of zirconia coping should be 0.6 mm, and the minimum thickness of veneering ceramic should be 1.2 mm. |
| |
Keywords: | Corresponding author: Dr Farhad Tabatabaian Department of Prosthodontics School of Dentistry Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Daneshjoo Blvd Tehran 1983963113 IRAN |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|