首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

微创手术和传统手术治疗肝胆管结石临床疗效对比研究
引用本文:米贤林. 微创手术和传统手术治疗肝胆管结石临床疗效对比研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2012, 18(15): 2229-2230
作者姓名:米贤林
作者单位:419500,湖南省辰溪县人民医院普外科
摘    要:目的 探讨微创手术和传统手术治疗肝胆管结石临床疗效的对比.方法 将62例肝胆管结石患者进行随机分组,其中治疗组31例,采用微创内镜手术治疗,对照组31例,采用传统手术治疗,根据观察结果,分析探讨两组的治疗效果.结果 治疗组术中出血量、手术时间以及术后引流管留置时间均低于对照组,术后并发症发生率、残石率、结石复发率也是治疗组较低,且两组的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 微创内镜手术治疗肝胆管结石的效果好,安全,副作用少.

关 键 词:胆结石  微创外科  内镜

The efficacy of minimally invasive surgery versus that of traditional surgery for intrahepatic bile duct stones
MI Xian-lin. The efficacy of minimally invasive surgery versus that of traditional surgery for intrahepatic bile duct stones[J]. International Medicine & Health Guidance News, 2012, 18(15): 2229-2230
Authors:MI Xian-lin
Affiliation:MI Xian-Iin. Department of General Surgery, People's Hospital of Chenxi County, Hunan 419500, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery versus that of traditional surgery for intrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods 62 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones were randomly assigned to receive minimally invasive surgery ( 31 patients, study group ), or traditional surgery ( 31 patients, control group ). The efficacy was assessed and compared between the two groups according to the surgical outcomes. Results Surgical duration and duration of drainage tube placement were shorter, intraoperative bleeding volume was smaller, and rates of postoperative complications, residual stones, and recurrence were lower in the study group than in the control group, with a statistical significance ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions Minimally incasive endoscopic surgery is effective, safe and has fewer side effects.
Keywords:Gallstone  Minimally invasive surgery  Endoscopy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号