The performance of a novel ball‐tipped Flush knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a case–control study

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 908–915

Summary

Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using short needle knives is safe and effective, but bleeding is a problem due to low haemostatic capability. Aim To assess the performance of a novel ball‐tipped needle knife (Flush knife‐BT) for ESD with particular emphasis on haemostasis. Methods A case–control study to compare the performance for ESD of 30 pairs of consecutive early gastrointestinal lesions (oesophagus: 12, stomach: 32, colorectum: 16) with standard Flush knife (F) vs. Flush knife‐BT (BT). Primary outcome was efficacy of intraprocedure haemostasis. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, procedure speed (dividing procedure time into the area of resected specimen), en bloc resection rate and recurrence rate. Results Median intraoperative bleeding points and bleeding points requiring haemostatic forceps were smaller in the BT group than in the F group (4 vs. 8, P < 0.0001, 0 vs. 3, P < 0.0001). There was no difference between groups for procedure time; however, procedure speed was shorter in the BT group (P = 0.0078). En bloc and en bloc R0 resection rates were 100%, with no perforation or post‐operative bleeding. No recurrence was observed in either group at follow‐up 1 year postprocedure. Conclusions Ball‐tipped Flush knife (Flush knife‐BT) appears to improve haemostatic efficacy and dissection speed compared with standard Flush knife.