Inter and intra laboratory concordance of HLA antibody results obtained by single antigen bead based assay |
| |
Authors: | Manish J. Gandhi Steven DeGoey Deborah Falbo Sarah Jenkins James R. Stubbs Harriet Noreen David F. Lorentzen JarHow Lee Mark Stegall |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Division of Transfusion Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States;2. University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinics, Fairview, 2312 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55454, United States;3. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, United States;4. One Lambda Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, 21001 Kittridge Street, Canoga Park, CA 91303, United States;5. Division of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States;6. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Single antigen bead based assays (SAB) to identify antibodies to HLA are marketed as a qualitative test, however often used as a quantitative test as the results provide mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) which is found to correlate with the strength/avidity of the antibody. We studied the between and within laboratory variability in performing the SAB from one manufacturer. Ten samples were tested at four laboratories according to the manufacturer’s suggested protocol. Additionally same samples were tested on four consecutive days in one laboratory. All tests were performed using the same lot of beads and secondary antibody. Results were classified as positive at four different MFI cutoffs: 1000, 5000, 8000 and 10,000. MFI values across and within the laboratory were compared in a pair-wise fashion with Pearson’s correlations. Overall concordance for Class-I was 97% between laboratories and 98% within laboratory at all cutoffs. Pair-wise Pearson correlation between laboratories was 0.989–0.99, while within laboratory it was 0.998–0.999. For Class-II, overall concordance between and within laboratory was 98%. Pair-wise Pearson correlation between laboratories was 0.991–0.997, while within laboratory it was 0.997–0.999. There is good correlation between laboratories and within laboratory using the same manufacturer, same lot and same protocol while performing SAB. |
| |
Keywords: | AMR, antibody mediated rejection anti-HLA, antibodies to human leukocyte antigen anti-IgG-PE, antihuman-IgG-conjugated phycoerythrin CDC, complement dependent cytotoxicity CV, coefficient of variation DSA, donor specific antibody Mayo, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN MFI, mean fluorescence intensity NC, negative control PC, positive control SAB, Single antigen bead based assay SD, Standard deviation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|