两种腹带治疗肠造口旁疝的效果观察

目的比较两种腹带治疗肠造口旁疝的效果.方法将36例肠造口旁疝患者分为两组,造口腹带组20例,普通腹带组16例.比较治疗后1个月的效果.结果造口腹带组有15例(75.0%)、普通腹带组有3例(18.8%)1个月后能坚持使用腹带.造口腹带对于减轻造口周围不适症状、防止体形改变、减少造口袋渗漏等均优于普通腹带(P<0.01).结论肠造口旁疝非手术治疗时,佩戴造口腹带比佩戴普通腹带更有效.

Effect of two kinds of abdominal belt on treatment of parastomal hernia

Objective To c ompare the result of two kinds of abdominal belt on tr eatment of parastomal hernia.Methods 36 cases of parastomal hernia were divide d into two groups, including routine abdominal belt group 16 cases, ostomy abdom inal belt group 20 cases.Results 15 patients(75.0% ) and 3 patients(18.8%) can keep on using abdominal belt in ostomy abdominal belt group and routine abdominal be lt gro up respectively. Compared with routine abdominal belt, ostomy abdominal belt gro up was mor e effective in relieving discomfort around the stoma, avoiding change in body ty pe and decreasing appliance leakage(P<0.01).Conclusions Ostomy abdominal belt is better than routine abdominal belt in the non-operative treatment of parasto mal hernia.