Attenuation correction in cardiac SPECT: The boy who cried wolf?

Conclusion  We would like to stress that we do not necessarily consider AC for SPECT MPI to be unfeasible or unworthy of scientific pursuit; indeed, a great deal of creative scientific effort has been poured into this area of investigation over the past 3 decades, and much of it has contributed to a better understanding of the physics, as well as the clinical aspects, of our field. However, the great variety of available AC hardware and software “flavors,” the historical pattern of commercial release of insufficiently validated AC implementations, and the increasingly clouded health care reimbursement horizon may have created an environment where the envisioned users of the technology have been desensitized and discouraged from expecting it to ever come to fruition in a standardized, validated, and costeffective form. It has been reported as recently as 2005 that the “entire base of SPECT cameras has only 5% of systems with attenuation correction.”8 Perhaps the reports of AC’s demise are exaggerated, but it certainly seems as if the people have spoken and, after readying themselves for the wolf one too many times, have come to the conclusion that “the future (of AC) ain’t what it used to be” . . .at least not yet.