首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Aerobic exercise versus combined exercise therapy in women with fibromyalgia syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
Authors:Sañudo Borja  Galiano Delfín  Carrasco Luis  Blagojevic Milisa  de Hoyo Moisés  Saxton John
Affiliation:aPhysical Education and Sport Department, University of Seville, Seville, Spain;bComputer and Sports Department, University Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain;cPrimary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK;dSchool of Allied Health Professions, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Abstract:
Sañudo B, Galiano D, Carrasco L, Blagojevic M, de Hoyo M, Saxton J. Aerobic exercise versus combined exercise therapy in women with fibromyalgia syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To investigate the effects of supervised aerobic exercise (AE) and a combined program of supervised aerobic, muscle strengthening, and flexibility exercises (combined exercise [CE]) on important health outcomes in women with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Community-based supervised intervention.

Participants

Women (N=64) with a diagnosis of FMS according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria.

Intervention

Participants were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: supervised AE, supervised CE, or usual-care control. Exercise sessions were performed twice weekly (45–60min/session) for 24 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measure was the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Exploratory outcome measures were the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), aerobic capacity (6-minute walk test), hand-grip strength, and range of motion in the shoulders and hips.

Results

Compliance with both interventions was excellent, with women in the exercise groups attending more than 85% of sessions. A 14% to 15% improvement from baseline in total FIQ score was observed in the exercise groups (P≤.02) and was accompanied by decreases in BDI scores of 8.5 (P<.001) and 6.4 (P<.001) points in the AE and CE groups, respectively. Relative to nonexercising controls, CE evoked improvements in the SF-36 Physical Functioning (P=.003) and Bodily Pain (P=.003) domains and was more effective than AE for evoking improvements in the Vitality (P=.002) and Mental Health (P=.04) domains. Greater improvements also were observed in shoulder/hip range of motion and handgrip strength in the CE group.

Conclusion

Given the equivalent time commitment required for AE and CE, our results suggest that women with FMS can gain additional health benefits by engaging in a similar volume of CE.
Keywords:Aerobic exercise   Combination exercise   Fibromyalgia   Rehabilitation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号