Utility of Diabetes Type–Specific Genetic Risk Scores for the Classification of Diabetes Type Among Multiethnic Youth |
| |
Authors: | Richard A. Oram,Seth A. Sharp,Catherine Pihoker,Lauric Ferrat,Giuseppina Imperatore,Adrienne Williams,Maria J. Redondo,Lynne Wagenknecht,Lawrence M. Dolan,Jean M. Lawrence,Michael N. Weedon,Ralph D’ Agostino,Jr.,William A. Hagopian,Jasmin Divers,Dana Dabelea |
| |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVEGenetic risk scores (GRS) aid classification of diabetes type in White European adult populations. We aimed to assess the utility of GRS in the classification of diabetes type among racially/ethnically diverse youth in the U.S.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe generated type 1 diabetes (T1D)- and type 2 diabetes (T2D)-specific GRS in 2,045 individuals from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. We assessed the distribution of genetic risk stratified by diabetes autoantibody positive or negative (DAA+/−) and insulin sensitivity (IS) or insulin resistance (IR) and self-reported race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, and other).RESULTST1D and T2D GRS were strong independent predictors of etiologic type. The T1D GRS was highest in the DAA+/IS group and lowest in the DAA−/IR group, with the inverse relationship observed with the T2D GRS. Discrimination was similar across all racial/ethnic groups but showed differences in score distribution. Clustering by combined genetic risk showed DAA+/IR and DAA−/IS individuals had a greater probability of T1D than T2D. In DAA− individuals, genetic probability of T1D identified individuals most likely to progress to absolute insulin deficiency.CONCLUSIONSDiabetes type–specific GRS are consistent predictors of diabetes type across racial/ethnic groups in a U.S. youth cohort, but future work needs to account for differences in GRS distribution by ancestry. T1D and T2D GRS may have particular utility for classification of DAA− children. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|