Infectious mononucleosis in Japan: Comparison with acute viral hepatitis type A

In order to clarify the characteristics of infectious mononucleosis hepatitis (IMH) in Japan, 20 cases with IMH treated at Kamo Hospital during the past 6 years (Group I) were analysed in comparison with cases of acute viral hepatitis, especially type A. The test for heterophil antibody was positive in only two cases. During the same period 209 cases were treated for acute viral hepatitis (type A: 77 cases = Group A; type B: 61 cases; type non-A, non-B: 71 cases). In Group I the common clinical symptoms and signs were headache, sore throat and lymph node swelling; jaundice was not as common as in Group A. GOT and GPT activities increased moderately in the acute stage, but they were significantly lower than those in Group A. LDH, AP, GGT and LAP activities were disproportionately higher to GPT activity in Group I. Liver biopsy in the convalescent stage showed that lipofuscin deposition and sinusoidal mononuclear cell infiltration were more prominent in Group I, while sinusoidal neutrocyte infiltration and focal necrosis at periportal areas were more common in Group A. Differential diagnosis of the two diseases could be made using these clinical features and histological findings. However, immunological differentiation is required for specific diagnosis because some features such as fever, prolonged elevation of thymol turbidity test, atypical lymphocytes in peripheral blod and predilection for young people were observed in both groups. Furthermore, the present study indicated that IMH is no longer rare and most cases do not demonstrate heterophil antibody in Japan.