首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

常规LASIK与波前像差引导的LASIK治疗中高度近视散光的对比研究
引用本文:杜玲芳,何芳,武正清,张艳丽,林鹏飞,宋伟琼. 常规LASIK与波前像差引导的LASIK治疗中高度近视散光的对比研究[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2013, 0(6): 521-523
作者姓名:杜玲芳  何芳  武正清  张艳丽  林鹏飞  宋伟琼
作者单位:湖南省郴州市第一人民医院眼视光中心,423000
摘    要:
目的 比较常规准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(简称常规LASIK)和波前像差引导的个体化LISIK(简称波前像差引导LASIK)矫正中高度近视散光后的视觉质量.方法 随机选取2011年1月至2012年12月在我院行准分子激光手术者,其中散光度数≥-2.00 DC作为入选对象共82例(163只眼).其中选择行波前像差引导的LASIK术者42例(83只眼),散光(-3.55±1.09) DC;接受常规LASIK术者40例(80只眼),散光(-3.47±1.23) DC.所有患者术前与术后7 d、1个月、6个月分别进行视力、角膜地形图、波前像差的检查和视疲劳满意度调查,比较两组的差别.结果 (1)术后7 d、1个月、6个月波前像差引导的LASIK术者视力分别优于常规LASIK术者(P<0.05).(2)角膜地形图查残余角膜散光度:波前像差组7 d、1个月、6个月分别为(-0.35±0.24) DC、(-0.42±0.13) DC、(-0.51±0.19) DC;常规组7 d、1个月、6个月分别为(-0.75±0.28) DC、(-0.92±0.23) DC、(-1.21±0.21) DC,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).(3)波前像差组和常规组高阶像差均呈增加趋势,以彗差和球差增加为主.波前像差组在总高阶像差(HOAROM)、30°三叶草(Z6)、垂直彗差(Z7)和水平彗差(Z8)高阶像差的改变显著优于常规组(P<0.05).(4)视疲劳满意度调查:波前像差组明显优于常规组.结论 波前像差引导的个性化LASIK较常规LASIK能更好地矫正中高度近视散光,使患者术后角膜残余散光更少,高阶像差的增加更少,视力恢复更理想,视觉质量更佳,患者的满意度更好.

关 键 词:准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术  波前像差  高阶像差  角膜地形图  视疲劳

The comparison of standard LASIK and wavefront aberration guided LASIK in treatment of high myopia astigmatism
DU Ling-fang,HE Fang,WU Zheng-qing,ZHANG Yan-li Zhang,LIN Peng-fei,SONG Wei-qiong. The comparison of standard LASIK and wavefront aberration guided LASIK in treatment of high myopia astigmatism[J]. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology, 2013, 0(6): 521-523
Authors:DU Ling-fang  HE Fang  WU Zheng-qing  ZHANG Yan-li Zhang  LIN Peng-fei  SONG Wei-qiong
Affiliation:. (Department of Ophthalmology, Chenzhou First People's Hospital, Hunan,Chenzhou 423000, China)
Abstract:
Objective To compare the visual quality outcomes of the standard LASIK and wavefront aberration guided LASIK surgery in high myopia astigmatism patients. Methods Totally 82 patients ( 163 eyes ) of high myopia astigmatism ( 92.00 D) who received excimer laser surgeries in our hospital between January 2011 and December 2011 were involved in this .study. Among these subjects, forty-two patients ( 83 eyes) were treated with wavefront aberration guided LSAIK, and forty patients were treated with standard LASIK. The average preoperative astigmatism was -3.55 ± 1.09 DC and -3.47± 1.23 DC respectively. Visual acuity, wavefront corneal topographic map, and visual fatigue were surveyed before and 7 days, 1 month, 6 months after surgery. Results ( 1 ) Visual acuity was significantly better in patients received wavefront guided LASIK than in patients received standard LASIK at 7 days, 1 month and 6 months ( P 〈 0.05 ). Residual astigmatism was - 0.35 ± 0.24 DC, - 0.42 ± 0.13 DC, and - 0.51 ±0. 19 DC in patients received wavefront aberration guided LASIK at 7 days, 1 month and 6 months, respectively. In contrast, residual astigmatism was much higher ( P 〈 0. 05 ) in patients received standard LASIK at the same time points ( - 0.75 ± 0.28 DC at 7 days, - 0.92 ± 0.23 DC at 1 month, and - 1.21 ±0.21 DC at 6 months, respectively). (3) Higher order aberrations, particularly, spherical and coma aberrations were found to be increased in beth groups. Total higher order aberrations ( HOAROM), 30°clover ( Z6), vertical coma (Z7) and level of coma ( Z8 ) aberrations were significantly smaller in wavefront aberration guided LASIK group (P 〈0.05 ). 4. The visual fatigue survey returned better responses in wavefront aberration guided IASIK group. Conclu- sion Wavefront aberration guided LASIK was relatively superior to standard LASIK in terms of correcting high myopia astigmatism, less residual astigmatism, less higher-order aberrations, better visual acuity, better visual quality, and better patient satisfaction.
Keywords:LASIK  Wavefront aberration  High order aberration  Corneal topographic map  Visual fatigue
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号