Genetic differences between the standard Ames tester strains TA100 and TA98 |
| |
Authors: | Jurado, Juan Alejandre-Duran, Encarnacion Pueyo, Carmen |
| |
Affiliation: | Departmento de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba 14071 Córdoba, Spain |
| |
Abstract: | The standard Ames tester strains of Salmonella typhimurium areseparated by many steps in their pedigree, some involving mutagentreatments, and contain independently isolated uvrB-bio-galdeletions and rfa mutations. In this work the araD531 mutationwas introduced into the Ames tester strains TA100 and TA98.The responsiveness of the resulting strains (BA15 and BA14)to a number of chemical mutagens was then assessed by monitoringthe induction of forward mutations to L-arabinose resistance(Ara test). Here we have shown that these two strains of theAmes test differ greatly in their responses to mutagens, inways that are not associated with the mutagenic specificitiesof the original his mutations. In general, the genetic backgroundof strain TA100 appears to be more sensitive to the killingeffects of chemicals than that of TA98. The greatest differenceswere found with nifurtimox (NFX) and its analogue, compound1K. The Ara test responded to the mutagenic effects of thesetwo nitrofurans when carried out in the genetic background ofstrain TA98 but not in that of TA100. A higher sensitivity tothe lethal effects of NFX and 1K together with the greater nitroreductioncapability of strain TA100 as compared with TA98 might explainthe differences. In conclusion, our results indicate that thestandard Ames S. typhimurium tester strains are not isogenicand that genetic differences at loci other than his might besignificant for mutagenicity testing. To this respect the routineuse of the isogenic set of S. typhimurium strains constructedby Popkin et al. (Mut. Res., 224, 453464, 1989) and derivedfrom strain hisD3052 (as the standard TA98) seems advisable. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|